Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Subframe connectors
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    BigTruckDriver is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    TX
    Car Year, Make, Model: hotrod
    Posts
    1,830

    Check Chris Alston Chassis, they have tech articles that walk you through the installation. I think its even on your same year mustank. Just kidding!, Check the site.
    Friends dont let friends drive fords!

  2. #2
    bb427stang's Avatar
    bb427stang is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Anaheim
    Car Year, Make, Model: '68 Mustang GT fastback
    Posts
    44

    Quote Originally Posted by BigTruckDriver
    Check Chris Alston Chassis, they have tech articles that walk you through the installation. I think its even on your same year mustank. Just kidding!, Check the site.
    Checked the site, and the only subframe build I saw was replacing the rear rails, tubbing it and replacing floor sections. A bit more than I want to do to this car.
    I don't understand why connectors would be thought of as "eye candy". It may not be as extensive (or rigid) as back-halfing a car, but certainly better than transferring all the load through the floor and roof.

  3. #3
    BigTruckDriver is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    TX
    Car Year, Make, Model: hotrod
    Posts
    1,830

    No , I think the eye candy that was talked about was "BOLT ON" and WELD IN that go under the floor.
    Friends dont let friends drive fords!

  4. #4
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by bb427stang
    Checked the site, and the only subframe build I saw was replacing the rear rails, tubbing it and replacing floor sections. A bit more than I want to do to this car.
    I don't understand why connectors would be thought of as "eye candy". It may not be as extensive (or rigid) as back-halfing a car, but certainly better than transferring all the load through the floor and roof.
    Read what I said again.... My statement was subframe connectors that were not welded to the floor as well as the front and rear subframe structures are eye candy.....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  5. #5
    bb427stang's Avatar
    bb427stang is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Anaheim
    Car Year, Make, Model: '68 Mustang GT fastback
    Posts
    44

    I shouldn't have mixed my response to BigTruckDriver and you together.... made it look like I thought you mentioned Alston. What threw me off was "The bolt on and the weld on's that just go under the floor or not much more then eye candy." Without cutting the car (notching the floor), my options are limited. Others with 65-69 Mustangs have noticed a considerable improvement with weld-ons... there's no way I would just bolt on a set.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink