Thread: for the engine guru's
Threaded View
-
02-12-2006 11:03 AM #11
IMO,for what it is worth the dwell time at TDC with the longer rod becomes more important with a larger port volume, higher comp. ratio and a blower,turbo,n20 also better piston skirt wear better ring seal,better ring life and cylinder bore wear.Here are some specs. on the heads I have built.I look more at the mid-lift numbere because the valve spends more time in this area then at max. lift of low lift numbers. These numbers are taken at 28 inches of water using a 2.055 valve with a under cut stem.The exhaust is 1.6 in dia. with a under cut on the stem. .200 lift 149 in./ 122 ex. .300 lift 209 in./ 159 ex. .400 lift /262 in./ 190 ex. .500 lift 290 in./ 224 ex. .600 lift 307/ 234 ex. .700 lift 316 in./ 242 ex.Sorry this is hard to read.Originally posted by Dave Severson
Never have looked at dart heads for a Ford. got a good link with some flow numbers for them????
I can change the lift numbers, no problem. For about 200 bucks more on the kit price I can have them put any lift numbers on this profile that I want.... they have another one around .700 lift, gets really close on coil bind though... what lift number would work???
Help me here..... A longer rod has more to do with port volume then anything, right???? I built one short rod stroker, it was a pup compared to the long rods. Was it the velocity, the rod aspect ratio, or time at tdc that was wrong?????





LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
time for a new forum to visit. when they sold sr.com it went down hill fast. no more forum just a cheap site selling junkie cars. the canadians killed hr.com. mods are real pricks. as with any site...
Where is everybody?