Hybrid View
-
02-09-2007 11:50 PM #1
I just wanted everyone to know I just got in from racing the space shuttle and I won. EASILY. My motor now goes to 22,000 rpm's after I loosened up the valves a little.....although I think I have a ticket coming because I ran the toll on the milky way........Burt
-
02-10-2007 01:13 AM #2
Now that is an obvious bulldust statement
But what the heck !
we are all a little nuts in here today
"aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"
Enzo Ferrari
-
02-10-2007 07:44 AM #3
Is it possible to turn 12,000? Don't bet against it. Have I ever seen one,no. But then I've never seen air either,and kind of depend on it. If I built an engine that wound that tight making usable power,I certainly wouldn't tell the spec's down at the local pub over beers. A closed mind learns little. Hank
-
02-10-2007 08:17 AM #4
Hank,go back and read post #130.
Originally Posted by halftanked
He says he is going to post them.
We are still waiting on those specs.
-
02-10-2007 04:56 PM #5
Scooter's back.
Good, you are back Scooter.
At least we did not drive you away.
-
02-10-2007 05:53 PM #6
[QUOTE=halftanked]Is it possible to turn 12,000? Don't bet against it. Have I ever seen one,no. But then I've never seen air either,and kind of depend on it. If I built an engine that wound that tight making usable power,I certainly wouldn't tell the spec's down at the local pub over beers. A closed mind learns little. Hank[/QUOTE
12,000 RPM isn't impossible, all the F1 cars run at least that, and many of the CART and IRL engines are bumping it.... But consistently with a flat tappet cam in a small block that still is making usable horsepower up there??? Put me on the doubters list....Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
02-10-2007 08:01 AM #7
Well to be fair he did say that the stroke was under chevy 302 which is 3", I think 2 7/8 was mention for this motor under discussion.
My only worry is how does the valvetrain hold together at high revs. I can figire reving that high with a missed shift going down the dragstrip, a quick blip up there and backing off."aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"
Enzo Ferrari
-
02-11-2007 04:44 AM #8
F1 is pushin 20,000 rpm's on some of the straightaways... put me on the doubters list for makin that much power as well. Why do you need it to rev that high, why not be happy w/ 7,500 or so rpm's.
-
02-19-2007 12:19 PM #9
Bump. Still waiting for specifications for 12,000 rpm's.
-
02-19-2007 01:48 PM #10
You might be waiting for a while.
Originally Posted by burty
-
02-19-2007 02:41 PM #11
just wait i had to go to tacoma for a week
-
02-19-2007 02:48 PM #12
You are being so esoteric ,I can hardly wait for those specs.
Originally Posted by gassersrule_196
-
02-25-2007 08:22 PM #13
Scooter's on top of it, he had to go to Tacoma for a yearxxxxxx monthxxxxxxx week, yeah, for a week.
Originally Posted by gassersrule_196
PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
02-26-2007 04:20 AM #14
Mean while back at the ranch.L.O.L.
Originally Posted by techinspector1
-
02-19-2007 02:59 PM #15
Are you sure you don't have a six cyl or 4 cyl tach in that thing LOL.
Just kiding, My old tach sure did look good, it had the wire removed in the back of the chip to read a six cyl rpm rather than 8 cyl so my 7000 rpm would show 8750 on the tach.






LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
time for a new forum to visit. when they sold sr.com it went down hill fast. no more forum just a cheap site selling junkie cars. the canadians killed hr.com. mods are real pricks. as with any site...
Where is everybody?