Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: T/O Bearing problem.
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    HellCaminoKid's Avatar
    HellCaminoKid is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    pittsburgh
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1980 El Camino
    Posts
    96

    diaphram p/plate.... wouldn't you think if it was too short I would have had the problem the moment i put the car back on the ground??? it took about a month for it to start acting up again.

  2. #2
    HellCaminoKid's Avatar
    HellCaminoKid is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    pittsburgh
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1980 El Camino
    Posts
    96

    haha, yea i guess good point. The nose cone on the super t-10 must have been a tad longer than the one on this muncie... i never had problems with that setup. well i'll probably be tearing it apart anyhow so ill give the long bearing a shot, i should have enough play in the fork to fit it in there.

  3. #3
    lt1s10's Avatar
    lt1s10 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    rustburg,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1997 CHEVY.S10 LT1-350
    Posts
    4,093

    [quote=HellCaminoKid]haha, yea i guess good point. The nose cone on the super t-10 must have been a tad longer than the one on this muncie...

    if thats true thats still not the reason you use short or long t/o bearing. the dif. is in the p/plate.
    Mike
    check my home page out!!!
    http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html




  4. #4
    HellCaminoKid's Avatar
    HellCaminoKid is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    pittsburgh
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1980 El Camino
    Posts
    96

    its a frustrating issue.... I've had it out and in 3 times in about a 2 month span. Instead of just getting the st-10 rebuilt I opted to change everything and put in the muncie that i knew was good.... saved me money at the time, but now its nothing but headaches... haha

  5. #5
    cffisher's Avatar
    cffisher is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Constantine
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 chevy 2 dr wagon
    Posts
    9,476

    There is one thing that you said that bothers me some. You put grease in the I'D of the T/O Bearing. When the clutch is depressed the brg goes forward over the spline. If there is grease there it will wind up in your clutch maybe one reason its going out so fast. Change to the long brg. and NO GREASE. Should work fine.
    Charlie
    Lovin' what I do and doing what I love
    Some guys can fix broken NO ONE can fix STUPID
    W8AMR
    http://fishertrains94.webs.com/
    Christian in training

  6. #6
    HellCaminoKid's Avatar
    HellCaminoKid is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    pittsburgh
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1980 El Camino
    Posts
    96

    OK, so heres the news. Tonight I went out and bough a Federal Mougal release bearing for pretty much any 60's - 90's non hydrolic GM clutch. This bearing was one of the self aligning ones which the one that was on the car was not. First tested it out on the quill of the transmission... didn't have as much freeplay as the other bearing on the shaft, good news so far. This new bearing was also different in the inner diameter. The groove where the antiseaze/grease was at the opposite side of the bearing.... hmmm... ok so what. Checked out the bellhouseing, fork, P/plate and anything else i could think of and put it all back together. Well besides the clutch needing a very small adjustment everything feels as smooth as butter. I guess we will see in about a month if the problem is fixed or just sort of pacified for now. Thanks again for everyongs input, gotta love this forum!!!

  7. #7
    lt1s10's Avatar
    lt1s10 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    rustburg,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1997 CHEVY.S10 LT1-350
    Posts
    4,093

    not being there to see what you have , its hard to tell. if its the rights set up and its going bad in 30 days, then you have some bad parts or something is out of adj. other wise ??????????
    Mike
    check my home page out!!!
    http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html




Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink