Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: chevy long bed to short
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    hotrodguy's Avatar
    hotrodguy is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    so.
    Car Year, Make, Model: 46 ford coupe
    Posts
    6

    chevy long bed to short

     



    Has anyone converted a 67-72 chevy long bed to short bed. classic trucks mag did one a few months back, i think it was a 66, what i need to know is information on 67-72.like how much to cut front and rear ,to get it to look right. i cannot find a short bed to compare to.thanks

  2. #2
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is online now CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Maple Valley
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 36, 39 Fords,
    Posts
    9,862

    guy, the quick answer to your question is 115" vs 127" wheelbase.

    All the "extra" length is in the "middle" of the frame. Shortening a frame is not that big a deal if you remember the basics, have excellent welding skills, reinforce the cut section, and are accurate in your measurements and cuts. There'll be a bunch of "little" things that need to be dealt with e.g. X member modification, shortening of brake lines, e brake cables, drive shaft, etc. Don't start the job without having the shorter bed as you'll likely need to move the bed mounting brackets.

    Personally, I'd put the extra effort into finding a SWB frame and bed and transfer my LWB stuff over, and then only if my LWB stuff was so much better than what would be available otherwise. And you didn't even mention whether the LWB was a 1/2 ton or not. If it's a 3/4 ton I wouldn't bother. This is one of those kind of projects where you're almost better off selling the LWB rig and finding a SWB to replace it with. Especially if there's going to be a lot of body work to be done on the existing fenders, cab, etc.
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

  3. #3
    Stu Cool's Avatar
    Stu Cool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Olivehurst, CA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '53 Studebaker Custom w/LS1
    Posts
    1,882

    There is a Chevy of that vintage running around our town that looks for all the world like he had a long wheelbase truck and spun a short bed around backwards on it. It really looks pretty neat. It's a fleetside and the rear wheelwells are almost at the back of the truck. Gives it kind of a bob-tail look. I have not had a chance to talk with him, just seen it on the street. He had to swap the tail gate from one end to the other, but he built a custom one. He's got it nicely lowered with wheels and tires that fill real well. It's still in primer so I'm sure he has more to do. Maybe this will give you some ideas.

    Pat
    Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong!

  4. #4
    Buckeye Bowtie's Avatar
    Buckeye Bowtie is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Car Year, Make, Model: 49 Chevrolet; 39 Buick Century;
    Posts
    11

    The dimensions are the same on those trucks as far as the bed goes, which would tell me the frames are pretty much the same also.
    I know the sheet metal design is different cosmetically, however if you were to replace the wooden floors on late 60 -72 trucks the length and widths of the boards used are the same for those years.
    I imagine you could use the article for the 66 you were talking about and apply it to your 67-72 truck.
    You could also check with some one like www.earlyclassic.com or www.gmcpauls.com. They would know for sure.

  5. #5
    ChevyKrawler is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Cheney
    Car Year, Make, Model: 71 Chevy K5
    Posts
    1

    67-72 Chevy

     



    Incidentily I am also looking at a similar venture. I have a 71 K5 4x4 Blazer and accualy am looking for a good long box 2WD since I have had no luck in finding anything that is a short box pickup of that year under 5000. I want to make my Blazer a 2wd and put air suspention on it. Make it more a road cruiser. I plan on getting a long box pickup and swap the blazer frame rite under the pickup cab while shortening the pickup frame to fit my Blazer body. No big prob yet,, till ya look at the pickup BOX.. Shortening it is a problem due to one line on the fleetside at about door handle level and runs the length to above the tail lights. well it is at an angle. Cutting a chunk out of the box just won't work it looks like. would miss mach the lines... Anyone have idea's? Currently I am thinkin it's going to be a wheeling rig after I do what I wanna do so I may build a Flat bed with a bunch of tool boxes and tanks and so on. But would still like to have a box.
    Devin

  6. #6
    rat427chev is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Springfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: 72 Chevy pickup
    Posts
    4

    67-72 Chevy

  7. #7
    rat427chev is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Springfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: 72 Chevy pickup
    Posts
    4

    67- 72 Chevy

    I read the article on shortening the 66 chevy in classic trucks mag. I am in the process of shortening a 71. The frame is no problem, But I think you best bet is to buy a good shortbed for the 67 to 72 body style. The earlier trucks have a much straighter body line at the very bottom of the side making them easier to shorten. Were the 67-72 angle upward from the rear tire to the rear bumper. This would be the hardest to get to look correct.

  8. #8
    SinistrV6's Avatar
    SinistrV6 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Gautier, MS
    Car Year, Make, Model: 36 Chevy Sedan (Turbo Buick Powered!)
    Posts
    86

    Different idea...

     



    I saw this one at Cruisin' the Coast in 2002. It appears to be a LWB truck with a SWB bed on it. He made up the difference by building an extended cab! Looks cool!

    http://community.webshots.com/photo/...12648700sGhUbe

    inside of the bed

    http://community.webshots.com/photo/...12648196xKyUpM
    Richard T. Gautier
    Gautier, MS
    1936 Chevy 2 dr sedan (Turbo Buick Powered!)

    Click the WWW button for pics

    2003 Chevy Avalanche w/o body hardware (black, of course)
    2003 Chevy Trailblazer (also black)


  9. #9
    dion is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    san diego
    Car Year, Make, Model: 72 chevy cheyenne
    Posts
    5

    several guys on this site have done it, check it out.

    http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/f...3?s=&forumid=3
    72 Chevy Cheyenne
    64 Dodge Dart GT

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink