Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Search:

Type: Posts; User: Oldf100fordman

Search: Search took 5.41 seconds.
  1. Replies
    11
    Views
    2,541

    Thanks for the info John. I kind of figured that...

    Thanks for the info John. I kind of figured that was the answer. But it is nice to know.
  2. Replies
    11
    Views
    2,541

    Well, Yeah, John, I'll buy that. In Canada they...

    Well, Yeah, John, I'll buy that. In Canada they might have put in the 312's. I know that Ford of Canada did things differently. By the way my 96 Lincoln Contiental Annniversary car was produced...
  3. Replies
    11
    Views
    2,541

    TD, you must be looking at the wrong book. the...

    TD, you must be looking at the wrong book. the 312 wasn 't offered in the 58 Merc. Only the 383 and the 430, period. 59 offered the 312 as the basic motor , but very few Merc's came off the...
  4. Replies
    11
    Views
    2,541

    Denny, My "The Complete Ford Book" (Peterson...

    Denny,

    My "The Complete Ford Book" (Peterson Publishing Company, Copyright 1970) list the 383 in two versions and the 430 in three versions for the Lincoln and Mercury for 1958. I know the...
  5. Replies
    11
    Views
    2,541

    58 Merc's used the MEL 383 and some may have come...

    58 Merc's used the MEL 383 and some may have come through with the 430. Hard to tell from my book. But no Y Blocks and no FE's. The 383 and 430 does use the same bellhousing pattern as the FE's...
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Links monetized by VigLink