Thread: Attempt to explain part 2
Results 1 to 15 of 34
Threaded View
-
01-07-2006 10:44 AM #20
Originally posted by Mike P
".....thats not true....."
Actually, gasser t you make the point for Bob and anyone else that is not particularly fond of rat rodders in almost every post you make.
There is confusion on what constitutes a rat rod, some people have actually written what they see as a Rat Rod. When you were asked you spouted some drivel".....high dollar defines its self. rat rod, work of art , self expression , integurity (dealing with people)....." as a definition. My definition of what a rat rod is listed in other posts, such as death to Rat Rods.
When someone doesn't agree with your point of view you resort to name calling (" biskit and gravy") and profanity, of course then your profess that someone else started it.
I will admit that your are one of the few of the rat rodders that posted a couple of pics of your car in your gallery, course the one that actually showed the car looks like it was taken 50 feet away. I also notice I do not see any pictures of the "..70 super bee(had since high school im 37) i got a 69 roadrunner, just sold my 72 cuda...." you say you have.
Besides yourself as a self professed rat rodder, there are others on this site who have cars/projects that are built on a Rat Rod theme (of course in a lot of cases I would not necessarily classify their cars as rat rods, but I use a lot stricter definition of the term). These gentleman and women actually articulate a point of view and respond to tech questions.
I won't attempt to speak for anyone else here, but personally, I enjoy a good tech discussion, bench racing, a debate on terms etc, and IMO this is one of the best automotive oriented sites on the net to do that. I even enjoy some of the rat rod post AS LONG AS THEY SOMETHING OF SUBSTANCE TO SAY.
Dammit, another good ol boy gone. Condolence to the family. RIP Mike
RIP Mike Frade, aka 34_40