Thread: gun control

Tweet

In reading all of Dave's comment I can't help but think there are some, like myself, that had the great responsibilty to help defend the USA. and will listen with the respect, due another human being. I was rised with guns and hunting for food and sport. I have weapons under lock and key ,unless I am using them for target practice .After my tours of duty overseas ,and the real hunting there .I don't want to hunt now, I don't think we need fully automatic weapons for home use .I don't agree with all of Dave's comment's ,but he's a lot closer to the truth than the trash running the NRA today J.

How many people do you know that has an automatic weapon? I sure dont know anyone.....it takes a $1000 BTAF tax stamp to possess one.

The problem is that the anti gun lobby has taken anew to ban any "semi-automatic" gun that looks like an "assault weapon" regardless of its rate of fire. People dont realize that the military .223 and the NATO equivalent were not specifically chosen for their killing power...their weight played a large part of the decision so the GI could carry more ammo.

The anti-gun tactics now are to ban all guns that have a "Detachable Magazine" using the rationale that if the magazine is removable, you can stick a bigger magazine in. Watch the news.....the press always says something like an "assault rifle" or "spraying bullets" or "automatic fire". Those dimwits have never tried pulling the trigger 20 or 30 times in rapid succession and tried to hit anything.

There used to be a statistic that the average gun fight involving a law enforcement person was over after something like 4.x shots were fired....dont know if such is still true but the guy firing a full auto M16 with two magazines taped together is essentially movie stuff. There are the drug guys in Mexico who have stolen or illegal autos but here in the USA, a full auto used in crime is a real rarity.


mike in tucson

Originally Posted by robot

How many people do you know that has an automatic weapon? I sure dont know anyone.....it takes a $1000 BTAF tax stamp to possess one.

The problem is that the anti gun lobby has taken anew to ban any "semi-automatic" gun that looks like an "assault weapon" regardless of its rate of fire. People dont realize that the military .223 and the NATO equivalent were not specifically chosen for their killing power...their weight played a large part of the decision so the GI could carry more ammo.

The anti-gun tactics now are to ban all guns that have a "Detachable Magazine" using the rationale that if the magazine is removable, you can stick a bigger magazine in. Watch the news.....the press always says something like an "assault rifle" or "spraying bullets" or "automatic fire". Those dimwits have never tried pulling the trigger 20 or 30 times in rapid succession and tried to hit anything.

There used to be a statistic that the average gun fight involving a law enforcement person was over after something like 4.x shots were fired....dont know if such is still true but the guy firing a full auto M16 with two magazines taped together is essentially movie stuff. There are the drug guys in Mexico who have stolen or illegal autos but here in the USA, a full auto used in crime is a real rarity.


mike in tucson

dont forget the brit 303 has a detachable magazine, yesh thats an assualt rifle

Originally Posted by robot

There are the drug guys in Mexico who have stolen or illegal autos but here in the USA, a full auto used in crime is a real rarity.


mike in tucson

And Mexico has stricter anti-gun laws than we do..........go figure.