Thread: Gas mileage king ;)
Hybrid View
-
01-17-2008 05:17 AM #1
then why does my de smogged 80 chevy pick up with a 350 only get 6-8 mpg?!!!
Originally Posted by halftanked
-
01-17-2008 06:31 AM #2
.......because it has the aerodynamics of a barn door, a tailgate that acts like a NA$CAR spoiler and a 5.88 set of rear gears maybe??
Originally Posted by gassersrule_196
Heck, my V10 F350 only does 10-12 around town
And it must have every smog control device known to man on it!!
Dave W
I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug
-
01-17-2008 07:11 AM #3
I'm considering building a car with a motorcycle engine and lots of lightweight stuff like a tube frame, etc. With gas getting nuts it would be cool to have a little driver that got really good gas milage. I know squat about motorcycles though, so if and when I decide to do it I'll need some input from the bikers among us to help pick one with the right cc's and all to use as a donor.
I'd just buy a moped, but with some of the drivers we have down here I at least want SOME protection around me.
Don
-
01-17-2008 07:39 AM #4
Why not a little ricer 4 cyl engine - some of them will do even better then many bike motors
Originally Posted by Itoldyouso
Dave W
I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug
-
01-17-2008 08:16 AM #5
A number of years ago there was an outfit in, I think, Reno NV that made a T bucket kit that took any one of a variety of 4 cyl motorcycle engines. It was roughly a 3/4 maybe 7/8 scale car. I suspect market demand didn't support their long term existence. It's all about hp and weight in this context so I don't know that the motorcycle engine would have any particular advantage if there were a comparable small car engine (Aveo, Fit, and so on).
Originally Posted by Itoldyouso
Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon
It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.
Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.
-
01-17-2008 04:24 PM #6
3:73's i got lucky
Originally Posted by IC2
being a stick helps somewhat to i guess
-
01-18-2008 05:16 AM #7
That ratio surprises me - my father in law had a '79 Chevy 2500 with a 350. If I recall, the final ratio and with a granny geared trans was in the 4.50 range and his mileage was horrible - like what you are getting. But by then in his life he only drove it 2 miles for coffee or 15 miles to my house to help me on my additions so it really didn't matter.
Originally Posted by gassersrule_196
Dave W
I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug
-
10-26-2007 07:50 PM #8
MY 78 bird with a 305 gets 18 MPG @ 80 MPH. But that number was generated a few years ago. Since then I have changed the rear from 2.56 to 2.41 and put many miles on the motor. Would be intresting to run the numbers again, but not too intrested in going back to Nevada to run out two tanks of gas @ 80MPH. However, it was the absolute NICEST cop I have ever had give me a ticket. Nice, guy, really..
Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
EG
-
11-10-2007 03:39 PM #9
Back in early 1983 the late & legendary Smokey Yunick fitted a 150 bhp 2 cylinder engine, of his own design, to a Plymouth Horizon test vehicle producing class leading power and fuel efficiency. There was a presentation to the Society of Automotive Engineers and talks with manufacturers for gasoline and diesel applications. I wonder whatever became of that? I suspect interest died out because by 1985/86 gas was cheap again.
-
11-11-2007 03:05 AM #10
Probably didn't have enough torque to pull anything of that day. Every car was a boat in the 80's. Would of been great in a CRX.
Originally Posted by MattC
-
11-11-2007 05:24 PM #11
well, no matter how I drive my Ford Ranger....hard or easy.......town or freeway....it gets 17-18 mpg and never changes.
-
01-16-2008 03:15 PM #12
I have a Pontiac Bonneville ad from 1978 that compares the 231 V6 powered Bonnie against the Audi 5000 of all cars, with Pontiac talking up the fact their car was 1,000s cheaper and was rated 1 mpg (EPA) higher, 18 versus 17 mpg. It was cheaper and thriftier than the import, technically, so the advert is true, but a Bonneville & Audi 5000 was a bizarre comparison, what were the GM ad men thinking...or smoking?
Originally Posted by 69elko
-
01-16-2008 03:23 PM #13
Yes,that was a bit of a stretch.
Originally Posted by MattC
-
01-17-2008 09:13 AM #14
Last year my 96 Eldorado Touring Coupe w/300HP and 104,000 miles on it ran a section of hiway at 70MPH for 300 miles and hit 28.8 MPG. For another 165 miles I wound up to 80 and 85 when possible and it averaged 26.8. Why the hell would I want some squeeky jap car?
There is no substitute for cubic inches
-
01-18-2008 02:58 PM #15
Don also wrote:
I'd just buy a moped, but with some of the drivers we have down here I at least want SOME protection around me.
Having driven in Florida periodically for the past 27 years I can't agree with you more. When the snow birds flock to town, I really only feel safe in a Hummer H1, and then only with brush guards on all four sides.
Bob
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail....but a true friend will be sitting next to you saying..."Damn....that was fun!






LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
I check in everyday and some are better than others. I don't think Brent has anything to do with the forum anymore, but I'm not sure. Hopefully as time moves on the forum will get better.
Where is everybody?