Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Compr ratio from a compr test?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by Gusaroo
    Dumb question: Can you calculate your compression ratio by doing a compression test? My buddy tells me you can't do it...
    I'll have to disagree with Denny. I all depends on the cam in the motor and the intake closing point ground into the intake lobe. Compression does not start until the intake valve closes, so you could have a 10:1 motor with a very short cam in it that would test out at, for instance, 200 lbs. Change the cam to a very long duration unit with a delayed intake closing point and you could read 120 lbs. I'm not being scientific on these figures, just trying to make a point.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  2. #2
    kennyd's Avatar
    kennyd is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    nw arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1961bubbletop,1967 chevelle conv.33 road
    Posts
    530

    Quote Originally Posted by techinspector1
    I'll have to disagree with Denny. I all depends on the cam in the motor and the intake closing point ground into the intake lobe. Compression does not start until the intake valve closes, so you could have a 10:1 motor with a very short cam in it that would test out at, for instance, 200 lbs. Change the cam to a very long duration unit with a delayed intake closing point and you could read 120 lbs. I'm not being scientific on these figures, just trying to make a point.

    i second that you cannot tell from a compression test .
    yes i drove ,the trailer didnot drive it's self
    FATGIRLS ARE LIKE MOPEDS , FUN TO RIDE JUST DONT LET YOUR FRIENDS SEE YOU ON THEM

  3. #3
    kennyd's Avatar
    kennyd is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    nw arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1961bubbletop,1967 chevelle conv.33 road
    Posts
    530

    Quote Originally Posted by DennyW
    The amount of compression you have, is, and will be your the compression ratio at that point in time. In other words, if the compression is lower, but all even, and the engine runs good, you can estimate the compression ratio for the lbs of compression you show.
    sorry , you cannot tell c.r. from a pressure test . example i have a smallblock 350 compression test said 125lbs , new motor 9.5 to 1 . i also had a 540 with 130lbs , new motor 15.0 to 1 . because the 540 had a camshaft that had a lot of overlap it released cyl. pressure .
    yes i drove ,the trailer didnot drive it's self
    FATGIRLS ARE LIKE MOPEDS , FUN TO RIDE JUST DONT LET YOUR FRIENDS SEE YOU ON THEM

  4. #4
    kennyd's Avatar
    kennyd is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    nw arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1961bubbletop,1967 chevelle conv.33 road
    Posts
    530

    Quote Originally Posted by DennyW
    You can disagree, it's ok. You didn't read my reply right, or I didn't explain it enough. This is in general rules. I started with 11.5 to 1. milled the heads .030 from clean up. 224º duration, 514 lift. .060 over in the bore, not decked. My compression is 175lbs. All within 5lbs. With that being done, I am actually over 11.5. I run premium 91 octane, no ping.

    That's what I was getting at on the cams. You need all the specs to know what you will end up with. I agree on that totally.
    i could take that same motor change the camshaft and you would have only 125lbs , and then your static compression would still be the same just lower cranking pressure .
    yes i drove ,the trailer didnot drive it's self
    FATGIRLS ARE LIKE MOPEDS , FUN TO RIDE JUST DONT LET YOUR FRIENDS SEE YOU ON THEM

  5. #5
    kennyd's Avatar
    kennyd is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    nw arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1961bubbletop,1967 chevelle conv.33 road
    Posts
    530

    Quote Originally Posted by DennyW
    That's called relative conpression actually. Relative to either the cranking rpm's, or the running rpm's.

    If you crank the engine over, and it reads 125lbs, then, that is the compression ratio.

    Same as if you run a 4 barrel carb. At idle, and light aceleration, it is a 2 barrel, but you have the 4 barrel option.

    i think you have confused with cylinder pressure or cranking pressure with compression ratio or static ratio .
    and the way he posed the question he was asking for compression ratio or static ratio , example 9 to 1 or 8.5 to 1 ratio .

    if you crank the engine over ,and it reads 125lbs . then thats cylinder pressure , not the C.R.
    yes i drove ,the trailer didnot drive it's self
    FATGIRLS ARE LIKE MOPEDS , FUN TO RIDE JUST DONT LET YOUR FRIENDS SEE YOU ON THEM

  6. #6
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    My take on this is........static compression is kind of like theoretical max pressure.The dynamic is the actuall pressure the engine will see.There is a guide to cranking pressure on the internet that was put out by some recognised names in performance.David Vizzard says he likes to see 190 + cranking pressure on a hot street motor with the proper associated components.The cranking pressure can be used to determine the approx dynamic pressure and aslo octane requirements of the engine.With the proper cam specs one can also estimate the actuall static copression ratio.

    Considering unless you cc every piece on the engine most calculations are approx estimates anyway...........
    I have found there is a converter /estimater for just about anything you could want to convert or estimate from just about any measurement you could possibly take on a engine.Whether these are anywhere close to actuall numbers is a different story..............but the conversion tables are out there.
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink