Results 1 to 15 of 34
Threaded View
-
09-12-2004 04:39 PM #22
Nice! Not that I could know, but that's what I was thinking while reading...jetting, or ignition. BTW, spent the summer in White Castle, LA in 1974. She was one fine young lady!Originally posted by 73RS
Builder,
I did put the car on the Dyno and was not pleased. The motor put out only 348 HP to the rear wheels. I am still working through that problem though. The cam is good to 76 to 7800 and the HP and Torque curve both peaked at only 5750. What I find strange is that both started to drop at the exact same time, so the engine is starving somewhere. The torque numbers were around 312 which is not good at all, but one thing, if you have a loose torque converter, which I have a 4500, you will get a lot lower torque numbers. A manual tranny car will always put up better numbers, even guys with auto's that have lock-up verters lock them up to get the higher torque numbers on the dyno. Our car club is having another dyno day in November and I hope to have made some changes by then and see if things are better.
I still have to do alot of tuning to figure out why the motor quits making power so early. I know it's not the heads and intake since I changed both and the car only went .14 faster at 11.54. I have the feeling it's in the jetting but don't have the time to get out to the track to play with it since I'm in the process of building a house right now. The good thing is when the house is finished I'll be only 20 minutes from the track where now I'm a little over an hour away.Now see? Just when I thought I was begining to understand...you go and say something like that!Now remember you can slow the pistons down using the 400 crank by running longer rods if that's your concern. They have some pretty long rods available. Even if you go with the 350 crank I would go with a 6 inch rod. I just didn't have the money at the time to go with the longer rods when I built my 377, shoot didn't have the money for a good after market crank either. My compression is only at 11.41. To make it to the 600 hp range on a naturally asperated you would have to go quit a bit higher, then you will always have to run race fuel. I still run pump gas in my motor without any pinging at 36 degrees of total timing.
I can understand how a longer rod would change the compression ratio (lower), but, if the crank swing remains the same, doesn't the piston speed stay the same too; no matter the rod? It just moves up and down the same amount in a slightly different area of the cylinder? Or, should I be thinking about changing the throw on the 400 crank and going to the longer rods? That can't be it, can it?. That would change the displacement, right? Sorry for the rookie question, but that one escapes me!I can honestly say that I have never heard a 377 in person. But, I can't wait!!! Here are 3 videos of the GTR setting a 0-100mph-0 record (10.3 sec with a 377). Wish I was there to hear (see) it! Thanks and good luck with your project too...Good luck on your quest, I do like the 377 and it has a sound all it's own. I always get complimented on how good the motor sounds coming out of duel 3 inch flowmatsers.
http://www.ihp.com/ultima/Ultima-0-100-0.mpg (about 3.8MB)
http://www.ihp.com/ultima/Ultima-0-100-0-InCar.mpg (about 3.8MB)
http://www.ihp.com/ultima/Ultima-0-100-0-Rear.mpg (about 6.4MB)-- Scott
AutoCAD & Telecom Pro,
Turned Mortgage Banker,
Turned Car Freak!
I feel more like I do now than I did when I got here.





LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Can't load on alternate browsers such as Seamonkey, Safari, or Firefox
Back online