Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 377 Build
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 34

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Builder's Avatar
    Builder is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Reno
    Car Year, Make, Model: 2005 Ultima GTR, '96 Impala LT1
    Posts
    21

    Originally posted by Don Shillady
    Hi Scot, with an adequate wallet you should find several engines of interest in the PAW calalog. To partially respond to your dyno-software question, I have not bought any yet but I have studied in considerable detail Ryans SBC dyno page:

    http://www.ryanscarpage.50megs.com/combos1.html

    The comment above about low rpm torque being better for the street is in agreement with my views.
    Thank you for the references, Don. Yes, I have read through the entire site at Ryan's. Excellent reading!?! I particularly like that Ryan has discovered God drives a Chevy...probably a '70 425hp 396 Camaro SS

    Also, I ordered the PAW catalog today. It should be here in about 3 weeks (years)!!! I have been reading the websites of Jesel, Brodix (got that catalog today), Chapman, and CompCam, as these are the known parts in the American Speed 377.

    Looks like a guy could spend $40 to $300 on this kind of desktop dyno software. Don't think I want to go there without seeing it, or at least speaking with someone that has used it before.

    While I do agree that low-end torque is important, the GTR only weighs 2,200 lbs wet. So the low end of low-end torque may not be as important for this rig. My Impala, on the other hand, has more torque than HP. It weighs in at about 4,200 lbs.!

    The close-ratio transaxle is designed for about 8k RPM max. The 377 should turn 7,500 without over-stressing the assembly. I don't know what the piston ft. per second rate is for that RPM, but the parts makers will have to support that requirement.

    Don - Tech1,
    Here are some additional high-HP combinations with forced induction (starting on page 8):
    http://www.procharger.com/pdf/Chevy.Prod.du.pdf

    Thanks again,
    Last edited by Builder; 09-11-2004 at 12:07 AM.
    -- Scott
    AutoCAD & Telecom Pro,
    Turned Mortgage Banker,
    Turned Car Freak!
    I feel more like I do now than I did when I got here.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink