Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: The Sb Destroker's Dream Engine
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 37

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    merc53man is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    reno
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1953 mercury hardtop + '56 chev p/u
    Posts
    93

    Unhappy

     



    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Severson
    Enough..... I don't guess on hp or use a virtual dyno. As a street car, the emphasis is torque, not horsepower. When it's all done I'll put it on the chassis dyno, do some tuning, and post the numbers.

    It also has a lot of "unique" sheet metal work, 4 bar rear suspension, coilover/strut front suspension, 6 point cage, custom dash, and a whole bunch of other mods. I build cars with certain parameters in mind and performance, styling, and handling goals planned out long in advance of the build ever starting. My ultimate goal is always to have all the components compliment each other and work together to achieve the goals I established in the planning stage. The 'maro is just a street drive, no big deal. The Ranchero would be most closely described as pro touring, with the objective being 250 mph at Bonneville. We used to have discussion here about building the car to a "theme"..... Doesn't happen much anymore I guess. About half the threads on here anymore are just a re-hash of which cam and heads to put in a sbc....... Nothing wrong with that, I guess. Just hate to see people limit themselves to just an engine, or just the paint, or just anything!!!!!! The entire car and all of it's pieces conveying the same theme and all designed and built to achieve a certain goal is way big fun!!!!!
    CHEERS TO THAT!
    you put it in better words than i could have. its really a great feeling to have done everything on your car yourself ( or almost if you dont have an engine boring machine or an englilsh wheel)

  2. #2
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by merc53man
    CHEERS TO THAT!
    you put it in better words than i could have. its really a great feeling to have done everything on your car yourself ( or almost if you dont have an engine boring machine or an englilsh wheel)
    AAAwwww man, you're gonna make me blush...... I am working on a homebuilt English Wheel and Planishing Hammer----getting waaaaaaaaaay to old to use mallets and shot bags!!!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  3. #3
    speedy55779's Avatar
    speedy55779 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    saginaw
    Car Year, Make, Model: 41 plymouth, 48 dodge truck
    Posts
    195

    Quote Originally Posted by tango
    I do think this is the most powerful destroked SB Chevy engine that can be made . It starts out with a 400 block . then a L/J ( 327 Crank ) With it's 3.250 Stroke . Install it in the block using TRW# MS3063P Thick-wall main bearings . And a set of 5.700" L/J Rods . With a set of TRW#L2418F Domed Pistons that will give a C/R of 12.5.1 with 64cc heads . Now you will have a ( 348ci SB ) or with a .030 over-bore a ( 352ci SB ) . COOL The TRW#s can be crossed .
    CarCraft did it around 2000 2001 if you can find it on their site but i read in their magazine they used a 400 block 327 crank and used ford 4.9Liter (300 L6) connecting rods and got like 450hp out of it on pump gas
    Derek Doble

  4. #4
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    Quote Originally Posted by speedy55779
    CarCraft did it around 2000 2001 if you can find it on their site but i read in their magazine they used a 400 block 327 crank and used ford 4.9Liter (300 L6) connecting rods and got like 450hp out of it on pump gas
    That sound like a wild set up . We have some of the 4.9 300 Ford engines at work . In 25 years I may have seen one throw a rod . We call them iron horses .

  5. #5
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    Dave I know what you mean . That's why My 1965 Mustang 289 K sits next to the Street strip Monte Carlo .

  6. #6
    speedy55779's Avatar
    speedy55779 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    saginaw
    Car Year, Make, Model: 41 plymouth, 48 dodge truck
    Posts
    195

    Quote Originally Posted by tango
    I do think this is the most powerful destroked SB Chevy engine that can be made . It starts out with a 400 block . then a L/J ( 327 Crank ) With it's 3.250 Stroke . Install it in the block using TRW# MS3063P Thick-wall main bearings . And a set of 5.700" L/J Rods . With a set of TRW#L2418F Domed Pistons that will give a C/R of 12.5.1 with 64cc heads . Now you will have a ( 348ci SB ) or with a .030 over-bore a ( 352ci SB ) . COOL The TRW#s can be crossed .
    you wouldn't be able to use 5.7 rods unless you found custom 400 pistons with the proper pin height otherwise if you do what you say and get it together when you have it at TDC the #1 piston will be .500 thousands 1/2 inch below deck height so you would need a 6+ rod thats what sucks it would be nice if all chev pistons had the same pin height where you could swap crank and rods all day long to make whatever cid you want stroking or destroking
    Derek Doble

  7. #7
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    With the TRW#L2418F Piston the pin hight is set up to run the 5.700 rods . These are not 327 piston . They are made only for the 348 to 352 de-stroke build .

  8. #8
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    Quote Originally Posted by DennyW
    ((The Ranchero would be most closely described as pro touring, with the objective being 250 mph at Bonneville.))

    Hey Dave, you going to run twin engines and turbos to get that 250 mph ?? You start getting over that 150 mark, the hp need really starts to climb.
    Hay Denny W I think that guy is running one of them FE 428s ?
    Attached Images

  9. #9
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by DennyW
    ((The Ranchero would be most closely described as pro touring, with the objective being 250 mph at Bonneville.))

    Hey Dave, you going to run twin engines and turbos to get that 250 mph ?? You start getting over that 150 mark, the hp need really starts to climb.
    Really? I didn't know that!!!!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  10. #10
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    Piston For The Build

     



    Here is a photo of the Piston That is needed for the De-stroke 400 build .
    Attached Images

  11. #11
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Yes, I'm quite aware that it does take power to go fast, and the amount of power required to go fast increases at a rate disproportionate to the speed. But it also takes a whole lot more then just power to get to 250. Lift, drag, downforce, lateral stability, spring ratings and shock valving, gear ratio's, traction (at B-Ville the lack of it), rate of acceleration, tire loading, and a whole host of other considerations come into it...... That's why I stated as an objective and not as some sort of silly___ claim.... We have about 3 years of (part time) research and 200+ man hours in the project so far. On paper it's close, in the real world it's at least 2 years and $70,000.00 away.

    Anyway, it's all for real and sitting in the shop anytime any of you would care to stop by and take a look.....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  12. #12
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Severson
    Yes, I'm quite aware that it does take power to go fast, and the amount of power required to go fast increases at a rate disproportionate to the speed. But it also takes a whole lot more then just power to get to 250. Lift, drag, downforce, lateral stability, spring ratings and shock valving, gear ratio's, traction (at B-Ville the lack of it), rate of acceleration, tire loading, and a whole host of other considerations come into it...... That's why I stated as an objective and not as some sort of silly___ claim.... We have about 3 years of (part time) research and 200+ man hours in the project so far. On paper it's close, in the real world it's at least 2 years and $70,000.00 away.

    Anyway, it's all for real and sitting in the shop anytime any of you would care to stop by and take a look.....
    Dave do you really think that Ranchero is a good Car/Truck to build for a high MPH Bonneville build . They may not even let you run some-thing like that . May-be it would be better as a street build . The Camaro would be the better car even with that 408 Ford engine for a Bonneville car . Do some more research !

  13. #13
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by tango
    Dave do you really think that Ranchero is a good Car/Truck to build for a high MPH Bonneville build . They may not even let you run some-thing like that . May-be it would be better as a street build . The Camaro would be the better car even with that 408 Ford engine for a Bonneville car . Do some more research !
    Well, it's not quite stock anymore, pics in my gallery. We're doing it because it is unique and we want to. Nothing really unique about just another 'maro. And yes, they will let me run it. B-Ville has a class for everything from 100cc motorcycles to jet powered cars. Safety rules are the big issue and I'm quite certain it will meet all of that criteria
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  14. #14
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Whatever.....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  15. #15
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Well, I thought it was a good reply... To further define, I'm not going through all that junk again. Bill doesn't need all the whining. I personally thought it was a reasonable thread for awhile. You are entitled to all your secrets. I have none, merely stated that anyone was welcome to stop by and take a look. Why you wanna get all defensive and start up and old argument again????? So, whatever was just my way of saying I don't really care to participate in another discussion about your engine.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink