Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Question on Lobe Seperation.....
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 16

Threaded View

  1. #3
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Your compression is more due to the point of intake valve closure. On a tighter LSA, you will have more dynamic compression unless you retard the cam. Most are advanced. Here's a decent link to some Cam Tech.

    On a 110 vs. 108 with same cam duration, power band will change about 300 RPM meaning it will come in 300 later and leave 300 sooner but will make more torque in the usable power band especially with handicapped heads, but you need a free flowing exhaust with the tighter LSA because it doesn't have the additional cylinder blow down that a wide LSA will provide with an earlier opening exhaust valve.
    Last edited by camaro_fever68; 07-11-2006 at 11:37 PM.
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink