Quote Originally Posted by shawnlee28
Sounds like a good motor to me,low rpm power means less engine wear and every time you shift it will drop down into to torque band. 500 + torque is good stuff
Keep in mind thats only a estimate from one simulation,real world results may differ
I am with Pat,I thought less on torque, just from other hp to torque build specs I have seen.Maybe the HP is close to 450 + ? Which would mean less low rpm torque.
From the page Viking posted it looks like about 250-260 on the inkake about 170-185 exaust are what flow numbers it takes to make close to 500hp.Your pretty close on the exaust ,maybe some ratio on the exaust rocker ? ...Or a split duration cam that is going to make up for the exaust and take advantage of those good intake numbers.
Ya, I was thinking about running 1.8's on the exhaust to see if it might help power. But I want to run this cam for now. If I really wanted to, I could have ported the exhaust a little more after I got the heads flowtested but I guess I got lazy.

I did do a desktop dyno before and put all my specs in, except it was a regular version of desktop dyno. It didn't have the headflow feature. Made 480 horsepower/490 torque. That sounded about right to me. I wouldn't think a 240 duration at .050 would make 500+ torque and only 415 horsepower. But I think I will be satisfied with 450 horsepower, considering I built the whole engine for about $4000. That was including the $500 March serpentine pulley kit. Can you say budget big block? I'm sure Pat can probably match that though. The more work you do yourself the cheaper it gets.