Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Hot Street 396 build, dyno numbers?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    viking's Avatar
    viking is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Branson area
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 T, 53 FLH , 66 C-10 454, 03 CVPI
    Posts
    968

    Just enter the flow numbers under the cylinder heads / custom port flow.

    Best list out there I know of...............


    http://racingfeed.com/downloads/chevy_flow_data.pdf
    Objects in the mirror are losing

  2. #2
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    This was one of my first port jobs, the exhaust didn't turn out quite as well as I'd hoped for but I did it without a flowbench. This flowtest was taken at GrommRacingHeads.

    intake/exhaust flow @ 28 inches
    .100 lift- 67/63.39
    .200 lift- 153/108
    .300 lift- 213/130
    .400 lift- 252/149
    .500 lift- 271/165

    Closed chamber 96.4cc
    255cc intake runner

  3. #3
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    Sounds like a good motor to me,low rpm power means less engine wear and every time you shift it will drop down into to torque band. 500 + torque is good stuff
    Keep in mind thats only a estimate from one simulation,real world results may differ
    I am with Pat,I thought less on torque, just from other hp to torque build specs I have seen.Maybe the HP is close to 450 + ? Which would mean less low rpm torque.
    From the page Viking posted it looks like about 250-260 on the inkake about 170-185 exaust are what flow numbers it takes to make close to 500hp.Your pretty close on the exaust ,maybe some ratio on the exaust rocker ? ...Or a split duration cam that is going to make up for the exaust and take advantage of those good intake numbers.
    Last edited by shawnlee28; 05-09-2007 at 12:06 AM.
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

  4. #4
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    Quote Originally Posted by shawnlee28
    Sounds like a good motor to me,low rpm power means less engine wear and every time you shift it will drop down into to torque band. 500 + torque is good stuff
    Keep in mind thats only a estimate from one simulation,real world results may differ
    I am with Pat,I thought less on torque, just from other hp to torque build specs I have seen.Maybe the HP is close to 450 + ? Which would mean less low rpm torque.
    From the page Viking posted it looks like about 250-260 on the inkake about 170-185 exaust are what flow numbers it takes to make close to 500hp.Your pretty close on the exaust ,maybe some ratio on the exaust rocker ? ...Or a split duration cam that is going to make up for the exaust and take advantage of those good intake numbers.
    Ya, I was thinking about running 1.8's on the exhaust to see if it might help power. But I want to run this cam for now. If I really wanted to, I could have ported the exhaust a little more after I got the heads flowtested but I guess I got lazy.

    I did do a desktop dyno before and put all my specs in, except it was a regular version of desktop dyno. It didn't have the headflow feature. Made 480 horsepower/490 torque. That sounded about right to me. I wouldn't think a 240 duration at .050 would make 500+ torque and only 415 horsepower. But I think I will be satisfied with 450 horsepower, considering I built the whole engine for about $4000. That was including the $500 March serpentine pulley kit. Can you say budget big block? I'm sure Pat can probably match that though. The more work you do yourself the cheaper it gets.

  5. #5
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by 69elko
    Ya, I was thinking about running 1.8's on the exhaust to see if it might help power. But I want to run this cam for now. If I really wanted to, I could have ported the exhaust a little more after I got the heads flowtested but I guess I got lazy.

    I did do a desktop dyno before and put all my specs in, except it was a regular version of desktop dyno. It didn't have the headflow feature. Made 480 horsepower/490 torque. That sounded about right to me. I wouldn't think a 240 duration at .050 would make 500+ torque and only 415 horsepower. But I think I will be satisfied with 450 horsepower, considering I built the whole engine for about $4000. That was including the $500 March serpentine pulley kit. Can you say budget big block? I'm sure Pat can probably match that though. The more work you do yourself the cheaper it gets.
    I am sorry I miss read your post about the mech. cam
    At 450 hp that is more than 1.1 hp per cubic inch and that sounds very good when using stock heads.
    I like the March products but they are very slow.
    Over a month a go I ordered a serpentine pulley kit for a customer and he is still waiting on it.
    Now today I hear they are shipping everything but the bottom crank pulley.
    They say I should get that in another few weeks.
    What can you do??

  6. #6
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    I am sorry I miss read your post about the mech. cam
    At 450 hp that is more than 1.1 hp per cubic inch and that sounds very good when using stock heads.
    I like the March products but they are very slow.
    Over a month a go I ordered a serpentine pulley kit for a customer and he is still waiting on it.
    Now today I hear they are shipping everything but the bottom crank pulley.
    They say I should get that in another few weeks.
    What can you do??
    Yeah when I ordered the kit from Summit they took a little longer than usual. Wasn't a month, but was about a week. Was missing the allen screws for the alternator pulley cap.

    Well, maybe I'm wrong. I guess I had higher hopes for this engine. There wasn't any other head I could use without the use of a massive dome piston which they don't make for a 396. All aftermarket heads are in the 113cc-119cc chamber range and would give me 8-9 compression with my 17cc dome piston. After all the hassle I've been through, I think I'm gonna build a 468 as my next engine.

  7. #7
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by 69elko
    Yeah when I ordered the kit from Summit they took a little longer than usual. Wasn't a month, but was about a week. Was missing the allen screws for the alternator pulley cap.

    Well, maybe I'm wrong. I guess I had higher hopes for this engine. There wasn't any other head I could use without the use of a massive dome piston which they don't make for a 396. All aftermarket heads are in the 113cc-119cc chamber range and would give me 8-9 compression with my 17cc dome piston. After all the hassle I've been through, I think I'm gonna build a 468 as my next engine.
    just go to a 496 they are not that much more and from there rigth to 565

  8. #8
    kitz's Avatar
    kitz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Roadster, BBC
    Posts
    962

    Quote Originally Posted by 69elko
    This was one of my first port jobs, the exhaust didn't turn out quite as well as I'd hoped for but I did it without a flowbench. This flowtest was taken at GrommRacingHeads.

    intake/exhaust flow @ 28 inches
    .100 lift- 67/63.39
    .200 lift- 153/108
    .300 lift- 213/130
    .400 lift- 252/149
    .500 lift- 271/165

    Closed chamber 96.4cc
    255cc intake runner
    The heads I used in DD have higher flow than what you posted .............

    Kitz
    Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink