4Likes
Results 1 to 5 of 5
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksThreaded View
-
09-20-2018 03:30 PM #1
CHR Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Westminster, CO
- Car Year, Make, Model: 37 Buick Roadmaster
- Posts
- 131
Improved Geometry for GM Triangulated 4-bar susenpension
I have a GM triangulated 4-bar rear suspension from a 95 B-body that I plan to swap into my 1937 Buick (like the one in the picture).
Still considering a torque arm set-up, but also looking at keeping with triangulated 4-bar for simplicity and lower cost.
I already bought UMR Performance adjustable lower control arms with Roto-joints on the axle end.
I have read that it is best to have all arms the same length.
The standard upper control arms are much shorter, so I'm wondering if I should try to fit something longer for better ride, or performance.
Suggestions and guidance would be welcome.
Thanks
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
i've enjoyed the years here . made a lot of friends. most who have left. i see no reason to continue with this so hope to see you somewhere else. i dont think this site will ever be back. it's lived...
Dead!