Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: thunderbird "mustang II" conversion
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    zieg99 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hermosa Beach
    Posts
    7

    thunderbird "mustang II" conversion

     



    I am planning on installing a new front end on my 65 thunderbird. I've narrowed it down to either TCI or Heidts. Anyone have any feedback on either of these makes, good or bad. Or any other suggestions or comments on this conversion.

    Thanks

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    I'm just wondering why you would do this.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  3. #3
    Thunderbucket's Avatar
    Thunderbucket is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Mission B.C.
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1962 Thunderbird
    Posts
    354

    Yeah,,,i'm wandering the same thing,,,Cos i have a 64 and a 62 Thunderbird,,,and they ride realy nice,,and they are plenty low to the ground,,,,and the Frame sections are way stronger than the Mustang II sections you plan on using,,,so why would you want to do this change over???
    Just curios.
    "I don't know everything and i like it that way"

  4. #4
    zieg99 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hermosa Beach
    Posts
    7

    That's why I posted the question for some feedback. Thanks.

    The idea of replacing the front end is basically two parts.

    1. The original front end is history. Just worn and old. I realize the replacement kits for these are inexpensive compared to the kits I am looking at.

    2. I have been told by some that the conversion will greatly increase the driveablity and handling of this car.

    and I wanted to upgrade the brakes. Seemed like a good way to take care of several issues.

    Any suggestions for a better way to proceed?

    Thanks again.

  5. #5
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    You can also greatly increase the handling and driveability of the car by rebuilding with stock components.

    Do as you wish, but if I were a buyer looking for a nice T-bird, I'd pass on a unit with a MII front. These cars will only get more valuable as time goes on and a mint original will bring all the money. Don't say you'll never sell it, you don't know what will happen in the future.

    The T-bird is quite a bit heavier than the MII car is and I'd be concerned about using lighter-duty components. Plus, you'll have to upgrade the MII brakes to have decent stopping power, so why wouldn't you just convert the Bird to discs and stow the original parts away in plastic?

    Give these guys a call and discuss it with them:
    http://www.mpbrakes.com/

    Or these guys:
    http://www.ssbrakes.com/

    Or these guys:
    http://www.baer.com/
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  6. #6
    Swifster's Avatar
    Swifster is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sterling Heights
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1964 Studebaker Commander
    Posts
    440

    Another vote for the T-Bird stuff.
    ---Tom

    1964 Studebaker Commander
    1964 Studebaker Daytona

  7. #7
    Thunderbucket's Avatar
    Thunderbucket is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Mission B.C.
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1962 Thunderbird
    Posts
    354

    As far as handling is concerned with the 62 thru 66 Thunderbirds go,,,They were built for cruising the highway with extreem comfort,,,replace the bushings, ball joints and shocks, Then take it for a spin and you'll wonder why you ever considered switching.
    And even though the disc brake conversion is nice,,i gotta tell ya,,,the front drums give me plenty of stopping power,,and if i want more,,i can alway's go oversize on the wheel cylinders.
    Needless to say,,,,,I love my Birds.
    "I don't know everything and i like it that way"

  8. #8
    zieg99 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hermosa Beach
    Posts
    7

    Thanks guys. I appreciate the comments.
    I will definitely give the project some more thought before moving forward.

    Thanks Again.

  9. #9
    BlueBlood is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    East Taunton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 Ford Thunderbird
    Posts
    1

    Thunderbird suspension

     



    Hi Zieg99, I too was considering that same swap but I was after the rack and pinion streeting. I have to agree the car rides nice like it is and there are big brake kits from Stainlees Steel Brakes. IF you don't want to go that way the 66 bird has big brakes that are stock from Ford. There is something else to consider though. Air Ride Technologies makes air ride kits for 61-66 birds. The following link should take you to the page I found and the kits aren't that expensive.

    http://www.ridetech.com/productinfo/coolride.asp

    Good luck
    Adrian

  10. #10
    zieg99 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hermosa Beach
    Posts
    7

    Adrian,

    Thanks for the info.

    I orignally wanted to upgrade the suspension because I was going to upgrade the engine.

    I decided to stay reasonably stock. The conversion required moderate frame work. I didn't want to get too experimental. I'm replacing all bushings, ball joints, tie rods, etc. and I went with a heavy duty stabilizer which should help. Also, I will hop up the 390 as best I can. I'll find out later if I made the right decision.

    Thanks again and good luck with your project
    Last edited by zieg99; 05-18-2005 at 10:59 AM.

  11. #11
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    "I will hop up the 390 as best I can"

    http://www.speedomotive.com/fe_ford_...id_stroker.htm

    Have them swap out the flat-tops for some dished pistons and let 'er rip.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  12. #12
    zieg99 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hermosa Beach
    Posts
    7

    I was considering a 428 crank to add some inches. I talked to speedomotive and the 390 kit you "linked" is giving me something to think about, for sure.
    They are also only 30 min from me. I will head over there when my block gets back from the shop.

    Thank you again.

  13. #13
    thunderchicken's Avatar
    thunderchicken is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Vancouver
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1966 Ford Thunderbird Custom
    Posts
    11

    Hey guys, just wanted to say hello. I have been searching for someone that was hot rodin a thunderbird, I thought I was the only one! I currently have a 1966 thunderbird that is at paint as we speak. It is recieving a two tone paint ( pearl green on top/ champange on bottom) I have shaved the emblems, hood "v", door handles, mirrors ect..

    My question is this, I want to put a set of intro wheels on it, 18x8 in front, 18x10 in rear, does anyone know the offset, backspacing and whatever other measurments that I would need to give them to ensure that the wheels I order fit?? Thanks for the help!
    I couldn't fix your brakes so I made your horn louder!!!

  14. #14
    4 cam tbird is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Lincoln
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1994 Ford Thunderbird
    Posts
    2

    Kicking around this old thread a little more but I have some questions in regards to the subject. My dad has a 61 we are working on. I have a 94 Bird that we swapped a DOHC 4.6L from a Mark VIII into. He's been wanting to do an old hot rod with a newer fuel injected motor in it and these motors look real cool and make good power. After driving my car he decided that that motor would be the way to go. The problem is, they are wider than the FE and 385 series Ford big blocks and don't fit between the shock towers. So, with this in mind, what thoughts does anyone have on redoing the front suspension with a Mustang II style kit?
    1994 Ford Thunderbird w/DOHC 4.6L and many other mods - FOR SALE!
    2004 Ford Lightning
    Wanted 68/9 Fastback Torino

  15. #15
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Have you measured the width of the shock towers and the motor? In my humble opinion, I think I'd rather modify the shock towers and retain the original handling and steering characteristics than install an MII front on this car.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink