Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Coolant in cylinders; fresh 400 sbc build
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 115

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    sg4356's Avatar
    sg4356 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Corinth, Texas, United States
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 ford roadster
    Posts
    410

    Bolts go into water jackets, so that is normal. thats why you always put sealer on all head bolts on a sbc
    Sometime Kool is the Rule But Bad is Bad

  2. #2
    robot's Avatar
    robot is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tucson
    Car Year, Make, Model: 39 Ford Coupe, 32 Ford Roadster
    Posts
    2,334

    462624 1976-1979 350 with 75.5 cc chambers

  3. #3
    glennsexton's Avatar
    glennsexton is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Tigard
    Car Year, Make, Model: 63 Nova SS
    Posts
    2,591

    Unfortunately, the 624 casting are probably the worst of the GM castings for cracking. They are prone to cracking across the exhaust seats and thru to the heat crossover. They’re not good candidates for any decking either.

    Mortec says they are from a 75-86 350 or 400, 76cc chamber. They were manufactured with 1.72/1.5, 1.94/1.5 or 2.02/1.6 valves

    If they have the 1.72/1.5 or the 2.02/1.6 valves and they are perfect – they may be worth drilling steam holes. If they are the small valves or (as is very likely) show any cracks, I’d start looking for new heads.

    If you have any budget, the Vortecs are a good way to go. This means a new intake manifold as well, but will definitely bring the 400 alive. GM Part Number 25534421 ($1100 a set or less on ebay) is a great head, 185cc runners and 66cc chambers. They’ll need steam holes drilled.

    Good Luck!
    Glenn
    "Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty." John Basil Barnhil

  4. #4
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    We really need to know more information about the block and pistons before you jump and buy different heads. What is the piston crown configuration? Can you post a pic? Is there a part number stamped on the top of the piston? With the piston at TDC, how far is it down in the bore? You can measure this with a set of feeler gauges and a straightedge ruler. What I'm getting at is that you have a fairly short cam in the motor now and with the large chambers of the heads you have now, the static compression ratio works out ok on pump gas. But if you go with smaller chambers, you may exceed the match-up of static compression ratio with the cam timing you have now and you'll be tearing back into the motor to change the cam. Let's try to make this work the first time. Post the info I asked for.
    You mentioned going with 305 heads. I can't think of a worse combination than 58cc heads on a 406 with a short cam and unknown squish. Detonation City.

    With the short block on a stand, get a buddy to stand in front of the motor and turn the crank with a socket and long bar on the harmonic damper retaining bolt head. This bolt is torqued to 65 ft/lbs, so it will not unwind if you turn the crank backwards easily. Roll the crank around so that the #1 piston (driver's side front) is at approximately top dead center. You will be standing at the side of the block at #1. Stand your ruler up on edge and span across the cylinder bore about a half inch from the edge of the bore. You will place the ruler at either 3 oclock or 9 oclock position. Placing it at noon or 6 oclock will allow the piston to rock on the wrist pin and give you an erroneous reading. Start with 0.025" or so and slide the gauge blades under the ruler and all the way to the cylinder wall. Have your buddy rock the crank back and forth so that the piston is coming up to TDC and back down in the bore just ever so slightly. If the piston doesn't push the ruler off the deck, then use more feeler gauge blades and try again. Maybe go 0.005" at a time until you find how far the piston is down in the hole at TDC. This is called the piston deck height. We must know this dimension before going any further. And don't forget the pic of the piston crown.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  5. #5
    Bigbzc's Avatar
    Bigbzc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Simpsonville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Chevy K5 Blazer
    Posts
    82

    Quote Originally Posted by glennsexton View Post
    Unfortunately, the 624 casting are probably the worst of the GM castings for cracking. They are prone to cracking across the exhaust seats and thru to the heat crossover. They’re not good candidates for any decking either.

    Mortec says they are from a 75-86 350 or 400, 76cc chamber. They were manufactured with 1.72/1.5, 1.94/1.5 or 2.02/1.6 valves

    If they have the 1.72/1.5 or the 2.02/1.6 valves and they are perfect – they may be worth drilling steam holes. If they are the small valves or (as is very likely) show any cracks, I’d start looking for new heads.

    If you have any budget, the Vortecs are a good way to go. This means a new intake manifold as well, but will definitely bring the 400 alive. GM Part Number 25534421 ($1100 a set or less on ebay) is a great head, 185cc runners and 66cc chambers. They’ll need steam holes drilled.

    Good Luck!
    Glenn

    I made another post but I guess it evaporated. Anyway, all I know about the heads is that they have been machined and have new valves so there should not be any cracks. I'll measure the valves tomorrow when I drill the holes. Thankx

  6. #6
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigbzc View Post
    I made another post but I guess it evaporated. Anyway, all I know about the heads is that they have been machined and have new valves so there should not be any cracks. I'll measure the valves tomorrow when I drill the holes. Thankx
    STOP! Don't do anything else until you have read and understood post #45.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  7. #7
    glennsexton's Avatar
    glennsexton is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Tigard
    Car Year, Make, Model: 63 Nova SS
    Posts
    2,591

    Yup - what Tech said - I was a bit premature in a head recommendation. It was my mistake to "assume" stock pistons and deck height. We might still get to the same place (i.e., Vortec heads) but it is really important to get the details of the PDH and squish.
    "Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty." John Basil Barnhil

  8. #8
    Bigbzc's Avatar
    Bigbzc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Simpsonville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Chevy K5 Blazer
    Posts
    82

    I don't plan on using different heads as I am out of money for this project. I will drill the 350 heads I have tomorrow and hope to have them in by the weekend depending on the weather

  9. #9
    cffisher's Avatar
    cffisher is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Constantine
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 chevy 2 dr wagon
    Posts
    9,476

    make sure you use the 400 gaskets
    Charlie
    Lovin' what I do and doing what I love
    Some guys can fix broken NO ONE can fix STUPID
    W8AMR
    http://fishertrains94.webs.com/
    Christian in training

  10. #10
    Bigbzc's Avatar
    Bigbzc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Simpsonville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Chevy K5 Blazer
    Posts
    82

    Quote Originally Posted by cffisher View Post
    make sure you use the 400 gaskets
    Yes sir! lol Gottem loaded in the truck to take to work tomorrow. I was hoping to see "paths" on the head or gasket from where the water leaking but there were none. I guess this could be because they were not on there very long. I do see the point that it CAN leak because there is not much of a seal in the steam holes of the gasket

  11. #11
    Bigbzc's Avatar
    Bigbzc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Simpsonville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Chevy K5 Blazer
    Posts
    82

    after looking at the gaskets carefully I noticed that there were no traces of water from the steam holes. What I did discover is that the cylinder seal of my gaskets are overlapping the coolant ports that are just beneath the spark plugs. So, now what?



  12. #12
    Bigbzc's Avatar
    Bigbzc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Simpsonville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Chevy K5 Blazer
    Posts
    82

    I think I figured it out. Measured the diameter of the bore on the gaskets and it measures 4.180" This block has NOT been bored and it's diameter is still 4.125" Looks like they gave me the wrong gaskets. Let me know if I am correct

  13. #13
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    No--gaskets are correct---the heads are wrong

  14. #14
    glennsexton's Avatar
    glennsexton is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Tigard
    Car Year, Make, Model: 63 Nova SS
    Posts
    2,591

    Can you take a couple close ups of the head and post them? Is either a bad picture or something nasty happened in the machine shop.
    "Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty." John Basil Barnhil

  15. #15
    Bigbzc's Avatar
    Bigbzc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Simpsonville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Chevy K5 Blazer
    Posts
    82

    Quote Originally Posted by glennsexton View Post
    Can you take a couple close ups of the head and post them? Is either a bad picture or something nasty happened in the machine shop.
    I was thinking that they shaved to much off the heads. The pics I posted are not bad, what yo see is what it is. See the notch in the coolant port in the 1st pic? That is where the biggest leak is but ports on other cylinders over lap the compression ring on the gasket and leak into the cylinder.

Reply To Thread
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink