Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Coolant in cylinders; fresh 400 sbc build
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 115

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Bigbzc's Avatar
    Bigbzc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Simpsonville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Chevy K5 Blazer
    Posts
    82

    Ok I had my personal guru (who just happens to be a Master Machinist and Master tech) look at the heads and he said they have been angle milled and too much. That they would make great boat anchors. He also looked at my 305 heads and told me that he would use those since I am looking to make more torque. They cam off a 86 transam and are the H.O. heads with 68cc chambers and 1.84" valves. Casting number is 14014416. Looks like this will be the rout I am going to try

  2. #2
    glennsexton's Avatar
    glennsexton is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Tigard
    Car Year, Make, Model: 63 Nova SS
    Posts
    2,591

    There are two schools of thought in regard to using 305 heads on a 400 – one says “with a ton of work, they can be used”. The other school says, “don’t use them..”

    I’m in the second school – The steam holes are the least of your problems. The heads you have (14014416) are 58cc (not 68cc) and that’s a big factor. With your all stock engine and a .040” head gasket you’ll be pushing close to 12:1 compression ratio with these heads. Couple that with the small valves and relatively short runners (165cc/59cc) and you will end up with a dog that will only run on premium fuel - anything over 10:1 starts to be touchy with pump gas.

    The 400 was designed for torque, but it still needs to breathe. Remember that an engine is really just a big ol’ air pump and the 400 was designed to move a lot more air through its stock heads than even HO 305 heads can supply.

    Your “stock” bore 400 is 4.125” and a 305 is 3.766” – do the math and you’ll have .359” of cast iron hanging over the cylinder area. You’ll play hob trying to get 400 gaskets to seal so you’d have to use 305 gaskets and they do not have provisions for steam holes.

    Probably not what you want to hear – but I think your frustration will be compounded if you bolt those heads on your 400.

    Check out this thread from several years back:

    using 305 heads on a 400 sbc

    We really do want to help you here –go back to Tech’s post #45 and get the measurements let us help you determine what a good head would be for your engine.

    Regards,
    Glenn
    "Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty." John Basil Barnhil

  3. #3
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    Bigbzc------

    When angle milling cylinder heads was a more or less common thing to do to raise compression so as not to need a large piston dome sticking up blocking the flame front---on a sbc they welded up those slots in the heads and then redrilled a hole to line up with the one in the block.

    Now , shortly , since you seem to have a blockage of anything any of us have posted, I will be deleting my posts later tonight, and I would highly recommend that others do the same thing>

  4. #4
    Bigbzc's Avatar
    Bigbzc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Simpsonville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Chevy K5 Blazer
    Posts
    82

    Ok, in regards to what you have all told me, we did a little more research and found that you are correct. A race engine builder told me that I would have to use racing fuel if I use those heads because of the high compression. Sorry that I have been stubborn about this. I just am over my budget and really can't afford new heads. I will get those measurements Tech wants tonight

  5. #5
    Trjohn57's Avatar
    Trjohn57 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Brandon
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 GTO 455 78 FLH 37 Pontiac
    Posts
    504

    I think all of you are doing a great thing trying to help this guy out. There's a lot to learn and that's all he's trying to do.
    I agree he needs the proper heads for the job. He's learning and so am I.
    Thanks. It's nice to see someone help.

  6. #6
    glennsexton's Avatar
    glennsexton is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Tigard
    Car Year, Make, Model: 63 Nova SS
    Posts
    2,591

    Well…. It’s what we all want to do – help others. Sometimes it’s hard because we all tend to have our own ideas about what is the “best way” to do something. I know I do – however; when it comes to engine building, I listen up to Jerry, Pat, Tech and some others here as they’re a storehouse of knowledge brought about by a lot of years of hands-on experience. I’ve built my share, but I’m not a machinist and I want to keep learning until the day they lay me to rest.

    Ask me how I know about steam holes and 400 SBC? Been down that road because I thought, “those tiny little holes can’t possibly be that important…” Well, let me tell you – they are! The machinist I was working with was gracious and gave me a “Heat and the Siamese Cylinder Block 101” lesson after hours in his shop and then he and I found a solid set of cores and he showed me the correct way to drill holes. You don’t soon forget those experiences and hopefully, when people come to CHR and have questions they’ll realize there is a lot of smart men (and brilliant women too - Barb!) who are passionate about what they know. Listen up, process the responses and make a decision. We’ll always support someone who wants to learn. Know-it-alls, eh –not so much.
    "Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty." John Basil Barnhil

  7. #7
    Bigbzc's Avatar
    Bigbzc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Simpsonville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Chevy K5 Blazer
    Posts
    82

    Ok, the squish is .041" THe piston clearance is greater than .030" my largest filer gauge is .030 and it slides freely. these are also dished pistons

  8. #8
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    In case you didn't know, you can stack feeler gauge blades one on top of the other to make any thickness you want. How did you arrive at 0.041 squish? Squish is the piston deck height plus the gasket thickness.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  9. #9
    Bigbzc's Avatar
    Bigbzc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Simpsonville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Chevy K5 Blazer
    Posts
    82

    Quote Originally Posted by techinspector1 View Post
    In case you didn't know, you can stack feeler gauge blades one on top of the other to make any thickness you want. How did you arrive at 0.041 squish? Squish is the piston deck height plus the gasket thickness.
    Thought it was just the thickness of the gasket. Deck height is .036 so that makes squish .077

  10. #10
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigbzc View Post
    Thought it was just the thickness of the gasket. Deck height is .036 so that makes squish .077
    Do you understand that 0.077" is pretty much unacceptable and that it needs to be between 0.035" and 0.045"?
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  11. #11
    Bigbzc's Avatar
    Bigbzc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Simpsonville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Chevy K5 Blazer
    Posts
    82

    Quote Originally Posted by techinspector1 View Post
    Do you understand that 0.077" is pretty much unacceptable and that it needs to be between 0.035" and 0.045"?
    I'll try to measure it again. It is in the truck so it makes it very hard to measure. However, the thickness of my gasket after being torqued down (compressed) is .041" which according to your specs isn't giving me much to work with and I know there is more than .004 deck hight. Maybe we are misunderstanding each other somewhere?

  12. #12
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    Piston clearance????/how did you measure that???I know you said feeler guage but how?????

  13. #13
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry clayton View Post
    Piston clearance????/how did you measure that???I know you said feeler guage but how?????
    Jerry, you must have a lot on your mind today because I know that sometime in the past 50 years of hot rodding, you've checked piston deck height with feeler gauges and a steel rule. I explained to this OP how to do it in post #45 and he is reporting back, saying that he has a squish dimension of 0.077" (0.036" piston deck height and 0.041" compressed gasket thickness).
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  14. #14
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    OK Tech

    I reread it---I was taking it that he checked piston to wall like above the ring land--I've had people do that before not understanding that the pistons are much smaller up there than the skirts.
    Have a good week end

    Jerry

  15. #15
    Bigbzc's Avatar
    Bigbzc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Simpsonville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Chevy K5 Blazer
    Posts
    82

    Well, as I have said over and over, that the bottom end including the pistons is stock and that is the way I plan to leave it. This means that the pistons are dished, just the way they come from the factory. Now your telling me that this will not work which is why I'm getting confused on what you are asking of me. I do not plan on racing this engine and am not seeking 500 hp out of it. At most, it will be used to tow my rock crawler.

Reply To Thread
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink