Hybrid View
- 
	01-29-2006 01:08 PM #11916 olds
 
 this is 1916 olds, cool car weird motor design i have never seen
 
- 
	01-29-2006 01:09 PM #2the motor
 
 picture of the motor
 
- 
	01-29-2006 06:22 PM #3
 Um, it's a flathead V-8. Similar to the Ford the came out 16 years later. Olds was a 'higher' class car and had V-8's from 1916 to 1921.---Tom 
 
 1964 Studebaker Commander
 1964 Studebaker Daytona
 
- 
	01-29-2006 06:39 PM #4
 i know its flat but im talking about is that the exhasut and intake are both on top the motor not out the sidesOriginally posted by Swifster
 Um, it's a flathead V-8. Similar to the Ford the came out 16 years later. Olds was a 'higher' class car and had V-8's from 1916 to 1921.
 
- 
	01-29-2006 08:35 PM #5
 Cadillac flathead V8's were designed the same way except for the distributor being in the back.
 
- 
	02-02-2006 08:33 PM #6
 Wow that is really different. I would love to tear that motor down!
 
- 
	02-03-2006 05:55 PM #7
 theres a guy in Minn. that i talk to that has a reverse flow 350 chevy carbs are where the exhaust go and exhaust where the intake goes im going to see if i can get a picture
 
 http://www.curv.net/hotrodder1934/pileup05/IMG_2021.JPGLast edited by gasser t; 02-03-2006 at 05:57 PM. 
 
- 
	02-03-2006 09:23 PM #8
 Is that thing for real?Originally posted by gasser t
 theres a guy in Minn. that i talk to that has a reverse flow 350 chevy carbs are where the exhaust go and exhaust where the intake goes im going to see if i can get a picture
 
 http://www.curv.net/hotrodder1934/pileup05/IMG_2021.JPG  
 If it is, it sure looks like it makes it a lot simpler to route the carbs and exhaust!  
 
- 
	02-04-2006 08:29 AM #9
 yup and it runs , pretty different . but i suppose i should swear and stuff and call them all names so i dont fit in, because i didnt invent the hotrod so i have no place unless im like them
 
- 
	02-04-2006 08:47 AM #10
 Theoretically, it's not that hard. Just change the cam so that the exhaust valves open in the intake stroke, etc. It's obvious that he's using the exhaust ports for intake and vice-versa, so the flow characteristics would be crap unless there was extensive head work done - such as porting and switching the intake and exhaust valve seats.
 
 That comes under my "what's the point" list.Jack 
 
 Gone to Texas
 
- 
	02-04-2006 09:29 AM #11
 its under my "Why not List"
 
- 
	02-04-2006 01:39 PM #12
 Well gasser, as you know I don't usually agree with you on much, and that's OK, but I have to admit that 350 takes the cake. I've never heard of such. I wonder if the owner if an engineering student or something? Chaulk it up to the most unusual list.
 
- 
	02-04-2006 07:29 PM #13
 when i talk to him on the phone he told me he work for GM design you could tell just by talking to himOriginally posted by Aster
 Well gasser, as you know I don't usually agree with you on much, and that's OK, but I have to admit that 350 takes the cake. I've never heard of such. I wonder if the owner if an engineering student or something? Chaulk it up to the most unusual list.
 
- 
	06-03-2011 09:04 PM #14
 
- 
	06-04-2011 05:13 AM #15
 This thread is older then me being on CHR !!!Dave W 
 I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug 
 






 
		
		 LinkBack URL
 LinkBack URL About LinkBacks
 About LinkBacks 
 
					
					
 Reply With Quote
 Reply With Quote Originally Posted by gasser t
 Originally Posted by gasser t
					


 
			
		
I'm happy to see it back up, sure hope it lasts.
Back online