Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 1951 Chev truck
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 59
  1. #31
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    personally, I'd keep it stock looking, but add a '53-'62 235 or 261 6cyl engine, to replace the babbit pounding 216.. dual carb/ 2bbl carb and headders, maby get the fully electronic distributor... if it just needs brakes now, it would not be hard to just put in the brakes/ brake lines quick, then tune it up and drive.
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  2. #32
    sgo70's Avatar
    sgo70 is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    496

    Still waiting for a call back, might have to go later this week. I love those 2 tone paint jobs. Really great work!!

    Sean

  3. #33
    tim_bo16's Avatar
    tim_bo16 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wisner
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1950 Chevy 3600 Pickup
    Posts
    191

    Quote Originally Posted by sgo70
    I have to finish my car first, there's no room in my garage.....but there's room in the driveway to store it . It's a 1 ton but there is a guy near by that has a 1/2 ton frame and I could shorten the box.

    NOOOOO!!! Don't shorten the box!! haha us long box owners need to prevail! I paid 800 bux US for mine. Body strait, one cab corner, floors, and the good ol' surface rust. Cleaned out gas lines, tank, new filter, new gas, coil, cleaned plugs, and it fired up!! A complete frame off, with the elky subframe and rear, and a young moneyloving little child, i have what i have now!
    Last edited by tim_bo16; 03-26-2008 at 12:41 AM.

  4. #34
    Don Meyer is offline Moderator Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    St Cloud
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 GMC trk & a 66 Rolls Royce
    Posts
    532

    The fat fender AD trks can be bought for a good price...but due to their gaining popularity the prices are rising. Here are a few shot of mine
    Don Meyer
    Attached Images
    Don Meyer, PhD-Mech Engr(48 GMC Trk/chopped/cab extended/caddy fins & a GM converted Rolls Royce Silver Shadow).

  5. #35
    tim_bo16's Avatar
    tim_bo16 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wisner
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1950 Chevy 3600 Pickup
    Posts
    191

    Quote Originally Posted by ceh383
    In mine there's almost nothing stock left. A lot of parts can be had through LMC Truck. There are other places as well. I'm not sure where you would go for drive line parts....I never looked
    ** Just to add, BROTHERS, Heavy Chevy, and Chevy Duty, are all good places for this style of truck, and as for the knicknacks, i've found Old Dog streetrods to be more than helpfull with anything.. *(see im just trying to make ur PARTS BUYING easyer for when you get that truck)*


    LONG LIVE THE LONG BED!

  6. #36
    treekiller's Avatar
    treekiller is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    eastern part
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1934 Schwinn
    Posts
    747

    LMC is good to . : http://www.lmctruck.com/ parts
    and don't forget : http://www.stovebolt.com/ lots of info



    TL
    "Whad'ya want for nuth'N, ..............aaa,rrrrrubber biscuit... ?"

    "bad spellers of the word untie ! "

    If your wondering how I'm doing I'm > " I'm still pick'N up the shinny stuff and passing open windows "

  7. #37
    Twitch's Avatar
    Twitch is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    L.A.
    Car Year, Make, Model: 73 Z-28
    Posts
    246

    Unless you go very radical like the yellow truck Don pictured you're gonna have just another late 40s-early 50s Chevy/GMC truck that's been messed with to some degree but doesn't stand out appreciably. I see those era trucks all the time and they're a dime a dozen and boring really. What the hell is the big deal about lowering it some, sticking some crate engine in and throwing a pair of buckets seats in it. That's not an improvment, that's not innovative, that's not unique. That's a late 40s-early 50s Chevy/GMC truck "formula" that everybody thinks is original till they see the next one.

    Chop the top, do a tilt front with a Chrysler 413 and a hydraulic bed but don't make it a clone truck.
    There is no substitute for cubic inches

  8. #38
    Flipper_1938's Avatar
    Flipper_1938 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Car Year, Make, Model: 47 Seagrave
    Posts
    683

    Quote Originally Posted by Twitch
    Unless you go very radical like the yellow truck Don pictured you're gonna have just another late 40s-early 50s Chevy/GMC truck that's been messed with to some degree but doesn't stand out appreciably. I see those era trucks all the time and they're a dime a dozen and boring really. What the hell is the big deal about lowering it some, sticking some crate engine in and throwing a pair of buckets seats in it. That's not an improvment, that's not innovative, that's not unique. That's a late 40s-early 50s Chevy/GMC truck "formula" that everybody thinks is original till they see the next one.

    Chop the top, do a tilt front with a Chrysler 413 and a hydraulic bed but don't make it a clone truck.
    They were damn good looking trucks to start with, following the "formula" makes them better. I wouldn't screw the truck up just to be different.

  9. #39
    tim_bo16's Avatar
    tim_bo16 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wisner
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1950 Chevy 3600 Pickup
    Posts
    191

    Quote Originally Posted by Twitch
    Unless you go very radical like the yellow truck Don pictured you're gonna have just another late 40s-early 50s Chevy/GMC truck that's been messed with to some degree but doesn't stand out appreciably. I see those era trucks all the time and they're a dime a dozen and boring really. What the hell is the big deal about lowering it some, sticking some crate engine in and throwing a pair of buckets seats in it. That's not an improvment, that's not innovative, that's not unique. That's a late 40s-early 50s Chevy/GMC truck "formula" that everybody thinks is original till they see the next one.

    Chop the top, do a tilt front with a Chrysler 413 and a hydraulic bed but don't make it a clone truck.

    That's not an improvment, that's not innovative, that's not unique? thats where you have to stop and say WHO REALLY BUILT THEIRS? i built my engine, i built my frame, i did all my metal work, i did all my interior, i did the paint, i did EVERYTHING, starting at the age of 14. and i DONT have money. So personally, I take that as an insult. I must say, the thing i find aggravating is the kids who mooch off of their parents and get what ever the hell they want. and i DO like seeing these styles of trucks, stock, radical, or just like something what i did, nothing big ya konw. i just like seeing people with the incentive to own them, to DRIVE THEM, and to work on them. not to PAY others to do it. By the way, not EVERYONE has the money to buy all the radical shit listed...^^ Everyone who builds a truck has their own unique touches here and there, and PERSONALLY i think that a hydraulic bed, a tilt front and a massive chop, looks HORRIBLE on these style of trucks. IMO. but hey, thats just me

  10. #40
    ceh383's Avatar
    ceh383 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Castaic
    Car Year, Make, Model: 51 Chevy pickup 350/350
    Posts
    387

    Quote Originally Posted by Twitch
    What the hell is the big deal about lowering it some, sticking some crate engine in and throwing a pair of buckets seats in it. That's not an improvment, that's not innovative, that's not unique. That's a late 40s-early 50s Chevy/GMC truck "formula" that everybody thinks is original till they see the next one.

    Chop the top, do a tilt front with a Chrysler 413 and a hydraulic bed but don't make it a clone truck.
    Mine got lower as a result of a complete suspension change. The 350 that's in it is not a crate motor. I still have the original seat in it....Don't want buckets. For you to say that's not an improvement is just wrong. It goes, stops, turns, and rides way better than it did when I got it....Sounds like an improvement to me. Chop the top, I'm 6'3" if I did that I couldn't drive it. Tilt front end, complete waste of $$$ I'd rather spend it on suspension. Chrysler 413, why? It's a Chevy. Hydraulic bed....Another why? It's another complete waste of $$$ and it adds a lot of extra weight.
    I did toy around with the idea of a big block, but with the added work involved and my limited amount of work space I decided on a small block.
    It may be a "formula" truck to you, but I like what I have and enjoy driving it....
    Our race team page

    Chuck

  11. #41
    falconvan's Avatar
    falconvan is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    festus
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 Plymouth, 48,54 Heap
    Posts
    3,407

    I believe in free speech but you had to know this was going to ruffle a few feathers. I like these old trucks done various ways; stock or modified looking. Maybe because we dont see as many here in the rust belt. Is this one original enough?
    Attached Images

  12. #42
    Don Meyer is offline Moderator Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    St Cloud
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 GMC trk & a 66 Rolls Royce
    Posts
    532

    Smile

     



    These trucks are just gorgeous. If you keep the body stock & give it a great paint job it will stand out.
    I like to add bucket seats, modern suspension & a nice interior.

    Don Meyer
    Don Meyer, PhD-Mech Engr(48 GMC Trk/chopped/cab extended/caddy fins & a GM converted Rolls Royce Silver Shadow).

  13. #43
    flh4speed's Avatar
    flh4speed is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Tupelo
    Car Year, Make, Model: 50 Ford , 55 Chevy
    Posts
    852

    id jump on the chance to buy the truck if possible , i agree with everyone 100% they make really nice rides..


    Age and treachery will always overcome youth and enthusiasm.

    Kenny

  14. #44
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    Quote Originally Posted by falconvan
    I believe in free speech but you had to know this was going to ruffle a few feathers. I like these old trucks done various ways; stock or modified looking. Maybe because we dont see as many here in the rust belt. Is this one original enough?
    Nah, the Mopar flathead 6 is an improvement over a 216 Chevy and the new frame w/ IFS, that's gotta be an improvement too. Looking pretty good
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  15. #45
    iceburgh's Avatar
    iceburgh is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    new bloomfield
    Posts
    356

    Quote Originally Posted by Twitch
    Unless you go very radical like the yellow truck Don pictured you're gonna have just another late 40s-early 50s Chevy/GMC truck that's been messed with to some degree but doesn't stand out appreciably. I see those era trucks all the time and they're a dime a dozen and boring really. What the hell is the big deal about lowering it some, sticking some crate engine in and throwing a pair of buckets seats in it. That's not an improvment, that's not innovative, that's not unique. That's a late 40s-early 50s Chevy/GMC truck "formula" that everybody thinks is original till they see the next one.

    Chop the top, do a tilt front with a Chrysler 413 and a hydraulic bed but don't make it a clone truck.
    Nice part of hot rodding is you get to do what you want and not give a chit what other people think.
    So unless it is your truck or your money nobody really cares what you think

Reply To Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink