Thread: Another Brookville body whine
Results 1 to 14 of 14
Threaded View
-
07-17-2007 04:37 PM #4
Jack and Bob,
This has gone to Brookville along with a yearly (until this year) visit to their display at York. I have it posted on another forum:
I think Brookville is a better choice than trying to restore a 74 - 75 year old original 31A roadster but I am at least a 2 years behind on finishing this project. I am NOT a body man. I feel that there should be an attempt by the manufacturer to produce a "quality" product as the Golohans (sp?) of Brookville stated to me. This is a partial list of aches and pains:
1.Right quarter was totally flat - did not have a bit of curve to match the left nor the door. This took many hours of disassembly and reassembly.
2. Neither rear quarter was welded to the sub frame only had 6-8 tabs bent over the subframe made for a floppy body.
3. The floor boards kinked while kneeling(I weigh less than 200#) in them to set up the seats - required new ones made up by my local Metal Supermarket.
4 Cowl cover missed the right cowl side by over 1/2 an inch, the left by ~1/4"
5. Hinges were bound up so tight they kinked the doors. Bushed with Oilite and made new pins and straightened the kinks
6. Most body rivets not bucked enough - needed to bolt and/or weld the entire body together.
7. Molding under the windshield needed complete reshaping.
8.The original one piece windshield posts that I purchased were ground to the point of paper thickness - returned for credit - also completely misdrilled the brass risers for the posts.Also the posts were not finished or chromed read the (real) fine print. I ended up with LeBarron Bonney stainless 2 piece posts
9. I ordered a 5" recessed firewall for a SB Ford and got a 3" so needed to modify it 2 more inches to clear.
10. The grille shell needed many repairs to look look and fit properly.
11. When fitting up the top, the upolsterer discovered the entire rear section of the body was off by up to .500 which required him to adjust the rear window in the top fabric.
12. The hot rod rear deck former is just plain poorly done I should have elected for the original wood style. This was corrected.
13. Their poor grade of primer had to be completely stripped it was up to .030 thick in places and covering a multitude of workmanship sins
14. There isnt a single panel on the car that is smooth enough for prime and paint without many hours of metal, filler and high fill primer work
And it goes on and on. I guess they may make and OK 28-9 and 32, but after this experience, not for me - I'd buy someone elses. I'm making the best of it and it will be a nice car when done but the extra work on a new steel car has been frustrating
Oh yes one good thing happened it fit the TCI frame nicely (theirs appears to be an old design TCI clone) !!!!
I have since found that one complaint was wrong - Henry Ford did use tabs to fasten the body to the subframe no welds
.
When the originals were manufactured they were indeed rough by today's standard but the rivits were properly bucked, the doors closed properly, the quarters and cowl were shaped correctly and the various panels were made from a strong enough steel that they wouldn't bend easily - I previously did own an original - and it was well put together (again, by the 1931 standards for a $495 sedan)Dave






LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
A belated Happy 78th Birthday Roger Spears
Belated Happy Birthday