Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Another Brookville body whine
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,898

    I wonder what a stock '30-31 would measure? Could it be they actually copied what Henry actually did? Their new '32 3 window was digitized from a genny car, warts and all. Don't know if they did it that way back when they tooled the '30-1.
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

  2. #2
    Irelands child's Avatar
    Irelands child is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ballston Lake
    Car Year, Make, Model: Ford 5.0L '31 A Brookville Roadster
    Posts
    667

    Jack and Bob,
    This has gone to Brookville along with a yearly (until this year) visit to their display at York. I have it posted on another forum:

    I think Brookville is a better choice than trying to restore a 74 - 75 year old original 31A roadster but I am at least a 2 years behind on finishing this project. I am NOT a body man. I feel that there should be an attempt by the manufacturer to produce a "quality" product as the Golohans (sp?) of Brookville stated to me. This is a partial list of aches and pains:
    1.Right quarter was totally flat - did not have a bit of curve to match the left nor the door. This took many hours of disassembly and reassembly.
    2. Neither rear quarter was welded to the sub frame only had 6-8 tabs bent over the subframe made for a floppy body.
    3. The floor boards kinked while kneeling(I weigh less than 200#) in them to set up the seats - required new ones made up by my local Metal Supermarket.
    4 Cowl cover missed the right cowl side by over 1/2 an inch, the left by ~1/4"
    5. Hinges were bound up so tight they kinked the doors. Bushed with Oilite and made new pins and straightened the kinks
    6. Most body rivets not bucked enough - needed to bolt and/or weld the entire body together.
    7. Molding under the windshield needed complete reshaping.
    8.The original one piece windshield posts that I purchased were ground to the point of paper thickness - returned for credit - also completely misdrilled the brass risers for the posts.Also the posts were not finished or chromed read the (real) fine print. I ended up with LeBarron Bonney stainless 2 piece posts
    9. I ordered a 5" recessed firewall for a SB Ford and got a 3" so needed to modify it 2 more inches to clear.
    10. The grille shell needed many repairs to look look and fit properly.
    11. When fitting up the top, the upolsterer discovered the entire rear section of the body was off by up to .500 which required him to adjust the rear window in the top fabric.
    12. The hot rod rear deck former is just plain poorly done I should have elected for the original wood style. This was corrected.
    13. Their poor grade of primer had to be completely stripped it was up to .030 thick in places and covering a multitude of workmanship sins
    14. There isnt a single panel on the car that is smooth enough for prime and paint without many hours of metal, filler and high fill primer work
    And it goes on and on. I guess they may make and OK 28-9 and 32, but after this experience, not for me - I'd buy someone elses. I'm making the best of it and it will be a nice car when done but the extra work on a new steel car has been frustrating
    Oh yes one good thing happened it fit the TCI frame nicely (theirs appears to be an old design TCI clone) !!!!


    I have since found that one complaint was wrong - Henry Ford did use tabs to fasten the body to the subframe no welds .

    When the originals were manufactured they were indeed rough by today's standard but the rivits were properly bucked, the doors closed properly, the quarters and cowl were shaped correctly and the various panels were made from a strong enough steel that they wouldn't bend easily - I previously did own an original - and it was well put together (again, by the 1931 standards for a $495 sedan)
    Dave

  3. #3
    Don Shillady's Avatar
    Don Shillady is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Ashland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 29 fendered roadster
    Posts
    2,160

    Gee, I would have not been able to handle all that. My Bebops 'glass decklid is slightly off but when closed the gap along the bottom edge is pretty even. Inside the rumble are there is some assymmetry in the 1" steel reinforcement tubing but I don't think that will be evident when the deck lid is closed. My main problem has been the huge trans tunnel in the Bebops body and the added work to reduce it took a lot of time. If anything, the Bebops firewall indent and the trans tunnel look like they are meant for a big block and I did have to add a stainless plate to the firewall after I cut out the the huge trans tunnel. However the Brookville frame is exceptionally straight and measurement from the center of the king pins to the opposite rear frame corner were made equal to less than 1/64" simply by minor tweaking of the four bar threads. My only minor complaint about the frame is that if you choose to use bumpers the small 5/16" threaded holes on the rear of the frame (two per side) fit nicely with the stock brackets if you cut them off as per instructions. Still those little bolts look too small for my 230 lb. on the rear rumble step plate and it definitely gave a wobbly bumper on the rear. One of my innovations of which I am most proud is not visible, but I found that one can simply reverse the pieces cut off the standard bumper brackets (with a little bending in a vise) and drill some holes to mount a second bumper brace under the frame where it is not visible using stouter 7/16" bolts through the frame. Now I can stand on the rumble step plate and bounce up and down and it is like a rock with motion only in the suspension! I have had a large distraction due to a contract I signed last August but I hope to get back to the car and finish the accelerator cable in a month or so, but I am sorry to learn about problems with the metal body. I am not very happy about having non-original fiberglass but it does seem pretty straight except for the oversize trans tunnel. Surprisingly so far all the body accessories I have purchased from Bratton's Antique Parts for a stock '29 have fit quite well on the Bebops 'glass. Ireland's child, this is partly a case of you knowing the imprefections but maybe keeping most of the small things to yourself and/or maybe you are getting near the end and are just weary. Take a day off and read Street Rodder to get your enthusiasm back. Let me know if you want a photo of how to use the cut off pieces of the bumper brackets because those little 5/16" mounting bolts on the frame are just too small for a heavy bumper let alone to absorb a 5 mph "bump".

    Don Shillady
    Retired (?) Scientist/teen rodder
    Last edited by Don Shillady; 07-17-2007 at 05:39 PM.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink