Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree27Likes

Thread: 37 Ford build--IE: old Header issues thread /37 Ford/5.0/GT40P heads
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 1567

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    bluestang67's Avatar
    bluestang67 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    New Lenox
    Car Year, Make, Model: 67 Mstg cpe , 37 Ford Coupe
    Posts
    2,787

    Quote Originally Posted by randyr View Post
    A lot of times those springs also don't exactly center the rear wheel in the wheel well on 37 & 38 Fords. Chassis Engineering Inc has a 1.5" lowering block kit that give up to 3/4" adjustment for the rear end to center the wheels. I'm going to get that kit because my wheels need to move forward 5/8 to 3/4". It'll be hard to tell if you need it till you put the rear fenders on.
    I have 2" drop spindles on the front of mine, too.
    The car is looking good. Glad to see he's making progress.
    Good info , but if it needs to be adjusted I will make new blocks though the sound of them slotted might mean some movement . Also I have asked a lot about 2 inch drops up front and a lot said it gets low enough but the pic looks almost stock also .

  2. #2
    randyr's Avatar
    randyr is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Santa Monica
    Car Year, Make, Model: 37 Ford tudor humpback
    Posts
    1,988

    Quote Originally Posted by bluestang67 View Post
    Good info , but if it needs to be adjusted I will make new blocks though the sound of them slotted might mean some movement . Also I have asked a lot about 2 inch drops up front and a lot said it gets low enough but the pic looks almost stock also .
    The pics of the lowering block kit looks like they give you a couple of hole choices rather than a slot. Shouldn't be any movement with that. Also, I may have mentioned this earlier but my current rear tires are 28". I think it probably needs 29" for that wheel well.

    As for the front, you might have to wait till you get the engine in and let the springs settle a little for getting the drop spindles.
    "It is not much good thinking of a thing unless you think it out." - H.G. Wells

  3. #3
    bluestang67's Avatar
    bluestang67 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    New Lenox
    Car Year, Make, Model: 67 Mstg cpe , 37 Ford Coupe
    Posts
    2,787

    Quote Originally Posted by randyr View Post
    The pics of the lowering block kit looks like they give you a couple of hole choices rather than a slot. Shouldn't be any movement with that. Also, I may have mentioned this earlier but my current rear tires are 28". I think it probably needs 29" for that wheel well.

    As for the front, you might have to wait till you get the engine in and let the springs settle a little for getting the drop spindles.
    Randy I was thinking the same thing full body on suspension then adjust from there !
    I see so many sitting low to the ground and try to figure out what they have used ?? Ask a lot of questions even at the shows .
    Last edited by bluestang67; 12-13-2010 at 09:02 PM.

  4. #4
    bluestang67's Avatar
    bluestang67 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    New Lenox
    Car Year, Make, Model: 67 Mstg cpe , 37 Ford Coupe
    Posts
    2,787

    Well I see lowering blocks for sure and a lot of tire size tries to get this right . Think I will keep the 255s in the rear really fills the wheel opening up .

    I need to drop off 2.5 inches in the rear , so either I narrow this 9 inch or look for a rear out of a 65 or 66 mustang that are 57.250 . And change the off set by a little , I do like the deep look on the wheels .


    He has the front suspension right on and the wheel there sits inside about a inch so its good .

  5. #5
    randyr's Avatar
    randyr is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Santa Monica
    Car Year, Make, Model: 37 Ford tudor humpback
    Posts
    1,988

    Quote Originally Posted by bluestang67 View Post
    Well I see lowering blocks for sure and a lot of tire size tries to get this right . Think I will keep the 255s in the rear really fills the wheel opening up .

    I need to drop off 2.5 inches in the rear , so either I narrow this 9 inch or look for a rear out of a 65 or 66 mustang that are 57.250 . And change the off set by a little , I do like the deep look on the wheels .


    He has the front suspension right on and the wheel there sits inside about a inch so its good .
    Too bad that rear end is a little wide, Bobby. I like the deep rims on it too. The 57-59 Ford car rear end is also 57.25". The 66-70something Bronco has a 58" I think.
    "It is not much good thinking of a thing unless you think it out." - H.G. Wells

  6. #6
    bluestang67's Avatar
    bluestang67 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    New Lenox
    Car Year, Make, Model: 67 Mstg cpe , 37 Ford Coupe
    Posts
    2,787

    Morning Randy did your rear TCI leafs set stock like these are ??

  7. #7
    randyr's Avatar
    randyr is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Santa Monica
    Car Year, Make, Model: 37 Ford tudor humpback
    Posts
    1,988

    Quote Originally Posted by bluestang67 View Post
    Morning Randy did your rear TCI leafs set stock like these are ??
    Hey Bobby, my springs actually came from SAC Hotrods in Orange Co, CA, but they may be exactly the same as the TCI springs. The rear shackle mounts are a little different though. The upper shackle goes through the frame. (yes, the rear section of my frame has 3/16th angle iron welded to it. My dad did that back when we first built the car. He thought it needed more "beef" to hold a spring mount.) These mounts are different than what I had on the car before.

    The first pic shows how the car sits with no weight on it except the body itself. There's no deck lid, gas tank, glass, interior or anything. I think all those parts should bring it down some but it'll still need to come down a little more. I also need to adjust the rear end forward about 1/2 -3/4" to center the wheel. This is a 28" diameter tire. 29" would be better I think.

    The other pics show the upper shackle mount through the frame instead of below it like yours. That probably makes a little bit of difference in the height.
    Attached Images
    "It is not much good thinking of a thing unless you think it out." - H.G. Wells

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink