Thread: Attention California Rodders
Hybrid View
- 
	08-27-2008 04:02 PM #1 Attention California Rodders Attention California Rodders
 
 A CA Legislator is after us again:
 
 From: SEMA Action Network
 Date sent 08/27/2008 02:08:27 pm
 Subject: SEMA Urgent Legislative Alert: California Lawmaker Trying to Sneak by a Bill to Require...
 
 Immediate Action Needed!
 
 California Lawmaker Trying to Sneak by a Bill to Require ANNUAL Emissions Tests for Vehicles
 15-Years Old and Older
 
 Committee Hearing set for August 28. Call Now!!!
 
 In an effort to avoid public scrutiny, California Assemblyman Dave Jones (Assemblymember.jones@assembly.ca.gov) has amended a completely unrelated bill with language to require annual Smog check inspections for vehicles 15-years old and older. This represents an obvious attempt to sneak through legislation in the closing days of the legislative session that had been previously defeated (A.B. 616). The new bill is designated as A.B. 3053.
 
 While pre-1976 motor vehicles would remain exempt under existing California law, this proposal ignores the fact that vehicles 15-years old and older still constitute a small portion of the overall vehicle population and are a poor source from which to look for emissions reduction. Furthermore, the bill would direct that the funds generated through annual inspection fees be used to scrap older cars. This represents another attempt by California legislators and regulators to scapegoat older cars.
 
 This is the type of activity that fuels distrust in public officials. SEMA caught this lawmaker’s underhanded attempt to circumvent public process and is now calling on you to help defeat A.B 3053 before it’s too late.
 
 Time is of the Essence! We Urge You to Call the California Senate Appropriations Committee (List Below) Immediately to Oppose A.B. 3053
 
 
 California Senate Appropriations Committee
 
 Senator Tom Torlakson – Chair
 Phone: 916/651-4007
 Email: senator.torlakson@sen.ca.gov
 
 Senator Dave Cox
 Phone: 916/651-4001
 Email: senator.cox@sen.ca.gov
 
 Senator Sam Aanestad
 Phone: 916/651-4004
 Email: senator.aanestad@sen.ca.gov
 
 Senator Roy Ashburn
 Phone: 916/651-4018
 Email: senator.ashburn@sen.ca.gov
 
 Senator Gilbert Cedillo
 Phone: 916/651-4022
 Email: senator.cedillo@sen.ca.gov
 
 Senator Ellen Corbett
 Phone: 916/651-4010
 
 Senator Robert Dutton
 Phone: 916/651-4031
 Email: senator.dutton@sen.ca.gov
 
 Senator Dean Florez
 Phone: 916/651-4016
 Email: senator.florez@sen.ca.gov
 
 Senator Sheila Kuehl
 Phone: 916/651-4023
 Email: senator.kuehl@sen.ca.gov
 
 Senator Jenny Oropeza
 Phone: 916/651-4028
 
 Senator Mark Ridley-Thomas
 Phone: 916/651-4026
 
 Senator George Runner
 Phone: 916/651-4017
 Email: senator.runner@sen.ca.gov
 
 Senator Joe Simitian
 Phone: 916/651-4011
 Email: senator.simitian@sen.ca.gov
 
 Senator Mark Wyland
 Phone: 916/651-4038
 
 Senator Leland Yee
 Phone: 916/651-4008
 
 
 Terms under which this service is provided to you: sema.org/disclaimer
 
 SEMA's mailing address: 1575 S. Valley Vista Dr., Diamond Bar, CA 91765
 
 Copyright 2007. Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA)Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong! 
 
- 
	08-27-2008 10:23 PM #2A good solution!
 
 The best thing for idiots like Him is like the Pace Picante add sez,"Git a Rope"  
 
- 
	08-28-2008 06:03 AM #3
 I've always thought that public floggings should be legalized for certain deserving politicians.......Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today! 
 Carroll Shelby
 
 Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!! 
 
- 
	08-28-2008 07:24 AM #4
 Hi Pat, just got back here,sorry I didn't have a chance to get together. Is the new act just another ploy to raise state revenues to help balance the budget or what! I can't imagine too many with the bucks to do otherwise driving a '77 to '93 anything,so this would only add to the burden of people struggling to get by now. Those morons would be better off getting a budget passed than coming up with ideas like this. It's they that should go totally unpaid til the budget gets passed, not all the little guys who work to keep the state running getting minimum wage until its passed. Hank
 
- 
	08-28-2008 08:09 AM #5
 What it comes down to, is they don't want anyone driving anything that's not new, brand stinking new. These people are so far out of touch it's rediculous. Smog checks every 2 years are a pain in the a** as it is. I hope it goes down in flames.
 
 Keith...
 
- 
	08-28-2008 01:19 PM #6My e-mail
 
 Hope this helps........my e-mail to Chairman, Tom Torklakson
 
 
 I Oppose bill 'A.B. 3053 . Please do the right thing and have it abolished. It is a very bad move, that affects many......many more situations than any thing good for the environment, or a very small amount of revenue for this State. There are much better way's for this State to acquire State funds. i.e The State lottery tax acquisitions.........a small amount add's up fast.
 Thank you for your time, and hopefully the right vote.
 Respectfully . Dennis Smiley.
 
 
 
 
 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.If I go to sleep........The clown's will eat me!! 
 Hmmmm.......24 hour's in a day......24 beer's in a case. Coincidence?..... I think not!.
 
- 
	09-08-2008 02:03 PM #7
 Here's good news from SEMA SAN:
 
 *******************************
 CALIFORNIA BILL TO REQUIRE ANNUAL EMISSIONS INSPECTIONS FOR OLDER CARS FAILS . . . AGAIN!
 
 The SAN defeated California legislation to require annual (rather than biennial) smog-check inspections for vehicles 15 years old and older. The bill would also have required that funds generated through the additional inspection fees be deposited into an account which could then be used to scrap older cars. In an effort to sneak the bill through in the closing days of the legislative session, California Assemblyman Dave Jones amended a completely unrelated bill with the annual smog-check inspection language.
 
 While pre-'76 motor vehicles would have remained exempt under existing California law, this proposal ignored the fact that vehicles 15 years old and older still constitute a small portion of the overall vehicle population and are a poor source from which to look for emissions reductions. This latest action represents the second time the SAN was able to defeat this legislation.
 
 Special thanks to the countless enthusiasts and car clubs whose quick and powerful response to this harmful bill prevented it from moving forward.
 
 **************************Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong! 
 
- 
	09-12-2008 01:10 PM #8
 i am glad i live in oklahoma
 
- 
	09-12-2008 01:16 PM #9
 California does have its ups and down, and not just from earthquakes!      "  "No matter where you go, there you are!" Steve. "No matter where you go, there you are!" Steve.
 
- 
	09-12-2008 03:04 PM #10
 All I can say is don't get complacent. What happens in CA often times ends up spreading East. I have to admit though, CA would be a lot nicer place if so dam many other people did not like it Originally Posted by 55ranchwagon Originally Posted by 55ranchwagon  
 
 PatOf course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong! 
 






 
		
		 LinkBack URL
 LinkBack URL About LinkBacks
 About LinkBacks 
 
					
					
 Reply With Quote
 Reply With Quote 
						
					
 
			
		
I'm happy to see it back up, sure hope it lasts.
Back online