Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree258Likes

Thread: 41 Willys Gasser project
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 1724

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Henry Rifle's Avatar
    Henry Rifle is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Little Elm
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford Low Boy w/ZZ430 Clone
    Posts
    3,890

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry clayton View Post

    Anti roll bars are a cover up for a suspension system that has short comings in certain areas of travel --------
    Sorry, Jerry, I don't buy that at all. An anti-roll bar is as much a part of the suspension system as a shock absorber, a spring, a hairpin or an A-arm - not a cover-up. Anti-roll bars have a specific purpose long recognized as a vital part of a good suspension system.

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry clayton View Post
    Any suspension component must transfer/resist/anchor a unwanted force and to do so will be detrimental to the vehicle in its primary function-----------
    I agree that a suspension component must transfer/resist/anchor a force (or a moment). However, I really don't understand your characterization of "detrimental." The primary purpose of most of our vehicles is to provide proper ride comfort (a property unique to each of us), and acceptable performance in straight line, cornering, acceleration and deceleration. Proper transfer of the forces you described will actually enhance the that primary function.

    If you meant that enhancing a part of the primary function, such as cornering, another part might be affected, I agree with that.

    By the way, I did not find the Hotchkis article to be a masterpiece, but other than the typo substituting "diameter" for "radius," it is factually correct. Also, I wasn't concerned about the 1,000 lbs-ft torque on the wheel. It's just an example with round numbers.
    Last edited by Henry Rifle; 06-13-2013 at 10:07 AM.
    Jack

    Gone to Texas

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink