Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Cadillac 500 head questions
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    SSsuperdave123 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Santa Fe
    Posts
    4

    Cadillac 500 head questions

     



    I got a 72 model, I think, 500 engine with 902 smog heads. I'm still learning about these engines but I know basic principles carry from any V8 to another. First, the 902's are 76cc I believe closed chamber. Is that head worth messing with or would a 120cc open chamber head from another year 500 make more sense for a big torque 4x4 truck motor? Second, if I use the 902 heads, I was going to install larger valves and unshroud them and do some mild porting and polishing and gasket matching. I would like to, ideally, weld or somehow block, from the exhaust port side, the heat crossover and emissions holes next to each valve guide. Can this be done, is it worthwhile, can I even weld to the heads? I don't know whether to go big open chambers and a dome piston setup for more flow or keep the small chambers and flat tops to keep CR around 9ish. What is the advice of the wise ones?

  2. #2
    roadster32's Avatar
    roadster32 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    watford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 26T Coupe, 32 Roadster, 41 Willys Coupe
    Posts
    2,363

    Dave get yourself over to this forum, every question you can ask about 472/500 Cadillacs will be answered http://www.cadillacpower.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=3

    I'm on there as Langy, I've learn't lots
    Its aweful lonesome in the saddle since my horse died.

  3. #3
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Here's the website for Maximum Torque Specialties if you don't get the answer you're looking for. Give them a call and they'll more than likely whip an answer on you....
    http://www.500cid.com/

    And here's Potter Automotive....
    http://www.cadillacperformanceparts.com/

    And also Cad Company....
    http://www.cad500parts.com/

  4. #4
    1gary is offline Banned Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Roch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 high top Astro van
    Posts
    2,520

    Thumbs up

     



    Here is a thread that I was involved in with a lot of good ref's and replies.One thing in summary that I think I found out about the caddy engines is in stock form the valve train/heads are fine,but if you want more the after market gets expensive.Also they are not a high rev'ing engine.

    Read threw the links and I think you will see what I am talking about.

    http://clubhotrod.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44826
    Good Bye

  5. #5
    roadster32's Avatar
    roadster32 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    watford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 26T Coupe, 32 Roadster, 41 Willys Coupe
    Posts
    2,363

    I'm currently building a 514ci for my 26T and have had excellent advice from the Cadillac forum i posted and also have had some interesting indepth technical conversations with Marty at MTS, Marty is also on the forum under the name Nashallac.

    Everyone i have spoken to have said to change out the cast pistons & conrods for forged (which i have done) then i meet up with a guy called Terry on the forum that is running a near identical setup to my engine that is running consistant 9's with his 26T except he still has the cast pistons and rods !!! the rods do have ARP bolts though.
    Its aweful lonesome in the saddle since my horse died.

  6. #6
    roadster32's Avatar
    roadster32 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    watford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 26T Coupe, 32 Roadster, 41 Willys Coupe
    Posts
    2,363

    Everyone i have spoken to has said the valvetrain needs changing to a shaft system, when you look at the stock rocker setup you will see why. The engine was never designed to see many revs but can be improved on pretty easily.
    I'm not so sure about that Hotrod article as i noticed a few errors when reading, one that stuck out was that they said the stock rod length was 6.370" when its actually 6.750" makes you think twice about reading it if they get something like this wrong !!!



    Quote Originally Posted by 1gary View Post
    Here is a thread that I was involved in with a lot of good ref's and replies.One thing in summary that I think I found out about the caddy engines is in stock form the valve train/heads are fine,but if you want more the after market gets expensive.Also they are not a high rev'ing engine.

    Read threw the links and I think you will see what I am talking about.

    http://clubhotrod.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44826
    Its aweful lonesome in the saddle since my horse died.

  7. #7
    vara4's Avatar
    vara4 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1947 International Pick Up
    Posts
    3,187

    I like the 1969 - 472 Close chamber heads
    those engines were 10.5 to 1 and were about 400 HP with 550 foot pounds of tourqe.

  8. #8
    roadster32's Avatar
    roadster32 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    watford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 26T Coupe, 32 Roadster, 41 Willys Coupe
    Posts
    2,363

    The later engines show reduced BHP figures but its because they started to measure BHP & Torque differently so the figures quoted are not as bad as they sometimes look.
    The early engines 68-70 have the 10-10.5 - 1 compression although i'm not sure how well they would do on todays gas, Our gas in england is a little better than yours i believe but still not great.


    Quote Originally Posted by vara4 View Post
    I like the 1969 - 472 Close chamber heads
    those engines were 10.5 to 1 and were about 400 HP with 550 foot pounds of tourqe.
    Its aweful lonesome in the saddle since my horse died.

  9. #9
    vara4's Avatar
    vara4 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1947 International Pick Up
    Posts
    3,187

    I would still install new valves and have the heads re - worked for todays fuel because those were made for leaded fuels. I am not sure how deep you are getting in to the moter but I would if I were re - building it use the earlier 70 pistons for the 500 because they are also differant then the later 500 pistons.
    Kurt

  10. #10
    roadster32's Avatar
    roadster32 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    watford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 26T Coupe, 32 Roadster, 41 Willys Coupe
    Posts
    2,363

    Cadillac heads don't need hardened seats as they are high nickel steel.
    No need to use the earlier pistons as these days there are KB hypereutetic or Forged available.
    You can't use the earlier piston with the later 120cc heads as the compression ratio would be stupid. Also the stock pistons either early or late are not recommended.

    My engine will produce in the region of 600bhp @ 5500rpm built as per Docs book, my pistons are +60 thou so is 514ci the only original part is the block and crank and both of those have been heavily modified.


    Quote Originally Posted by vara4 View Post
    I would still install new valves and have the heads re - worked for todays fuel because those were made for leaded fuels. I am not sure how deep you are getting in to the moter but I would if I were re - building it use the earlier 70 pistons for the 500 because they are also differant then the later 500 pistons.
    Kurt
    Last edited by roadster32; 12-29-2010 at 11:53 AM.
    Its aweful lonesome in the saddle since my horse died.

  11. #11
    vara4's Avatar
    vara4 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1947 International Pick Up
    Posts
    3,187

    Roadster I know about the high nickel in the metal the old caddy's had thats why they wore so good or lasted so long. I was just mentioning the pistons because there were several piston changes over the years. Of couse the after markets are better and you could make lots more HP. There are lots of thing you could do to a new motor like that differant cams fuel injection after market heads intakes and all. The question is how much does he want to spend $$$$.
    Kurt

  12. #12
    skid-mark's Avatar
    skid-mark is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Springfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: 63 Nova Wagon
    Posts
    12

    I've messed around with a few Caddy engines in the past and found if you want the stock intake to flow a bit better you can (see pic) re-work the center divider. With a 1"-2" spacer it will give you a noticeable increase in mid-range power. The better way is of course to purchase the Edelbrock aluminum intake but, plan on speeding $200.00 or more.

    "Great" engines with excellent torque!


Reply To Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink