Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Hillborn EFI question
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Joe G's Avatar
    Joe G is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Paul
    Posts
    81

    Hillborn EFI question

     



    I'm working on this Dearborn Deuce that has a 327 with Hillborn EFI, and I want to find a better computer for it than the Carbine unit that came with the kit.
    TDST2.jpg

    The carbine system uses only a TPS, a coolant temp sensor and a tach signal to control the injectors. It allows you to change settings manually using potientiometers, but the settings are in 1000 rpm increments which doesn't allow for fine tuning. The Carbine's main selling point is that it does not require a PC to program it, but the tradeoff is lack of precision. The engine builder tuned the system on a chassis dyno, but it always seems to run way rich - it burns your eyes more than it burns rubber.

    I realize that the architecture of the Hillborn intake isn't going to allow for intake air temp sensors, or idle air control systems, but I'd like to find a computer that utilizes a MAP sensor and O2 sensors to help trim the fuel mixture and operate as a closed-loop system.

    There are several EFI computers available from MSD, Megasquirt, and a few other manufacturers. I've done a great deal of reading on their websites, so much that it makes my brain hurt. So, I'm looking for advice from anyone who may have knowlege or experience in the area of aftermarket fuel injection systems.

    The owner of this car also has a pair of 401 Buick engines being built for other projects that will also have this same induction system.

    Any info or advice (other than to use a different intake - that's not an option) would be greatly appreciated.

    Joe G.
    Last edited by Joe G; 06-02-2008 at 08:44 AM. Reason: fixing image link

  2. #2
    kennyd's Avatar
    kennyd is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    nw arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1961bubbletop,1967 chevelle conv.33 road
    Posts
    530

    that funny , because i also have this same unit . i also have problems with that system . i called hilborn and worked with them for 5 weeks . to make it a short anwser i changed mine over to FAST computer . very happy !
    call me sometime and i will discuss the problems you will have with this system .
    hilborn is not a customer service company !
    yes i drove ,the trailer didnot drive it's self
    FATGIRLS ARE LIKE MOPEDS , FUN TO RIDE JUST DONT LET YOUR FRIENDS SEE YOU ON THEM

  3. #3
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    we also used fast systems---built an IAC system , and just put the iat near the intakes so it samples the ambient air temp that the injectors get. the map sensor gets hooked into vacume source that is common to all cylinders.
    If you want more info or maybe some pics of IAC , PM me

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink