Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: are roller tipped rockers worth the investment?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 38

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
    i had 1.6 harland sharps on a 4.3 this was my driver i bet they had 10.000 on them and still where ok when i soild it so matt like dave S said this is on places to get cheap sorry dave i can not help here but to say i not a big fan of the new trend for super big rocker ratios was talking to a guy that was running 1.8?? on some killer small block i just do not know how they keep the valve springs in them
    We never went that big, just 1.6 and 1.7 on the exhaust side. For whatever reason (exhaust scavenging manybe) seemed to extend the hi torque range by about 800 RPM on the dyno. Probably nothing that would ever matter on the street.....???? Coil bind does become an issue, along with tipping the rocker past the center of the valve stem.....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  2. #2
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Severson
    We never went that big, just 1.6 and 1.7 on the exhaust side. For whatever reason (exhaust scavenging manybe) seemed to extend the hi torque range by about 800 RPM on the dyno. Probably nothing that would ever matter on the street.....???? Coil bind does become an issue, along with tipping the rocker past the center of the valve stem.....
    Yes,Dave the increased rocker arm ratio on the exhaust side will help to wake it up if your intake to exhaust ratio is a little off.

  3. #3
    cffisher's Avatar
    cffisher is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Constantine
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 chevy 2 dr wagon
    Posts
    9,476

    A little somthing from left field.Rather than useing more lift why not more duration and leave your lift at 5.1
    Charlie
    Lovin' what I do and doing what I love
    Some guys can fix broken NO ONE can fix STUPID
    W8AMR
    http://fishertrains94.webs.com/
    Christian in training

  4. #4
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    Quote Originally Posted by cffisher
    A little somthing from left field.Rather than useing more lift why not more duration and leave your lift at 5.1
    from my understanding, a turbo would work best with a shorter dururation with a lot of lift, that's why I decided on going with 1.6 or 1.65 rockers.
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  5. #5
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by cffisher
    A little somthing from left field.Rather than useing more lift why not more duration and leave your lift at 5.1
    for a turbo you have to watch the duration on the ex side

  6. #6
    cffisher's Avatar
    cffisher is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Constantine
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 chevy 2 dr wagon
    Posts
    9,476

    Don't know if you don't ask
    Charlie
    Lovin' what I do and doing what I love
    Some guys can fix broken NO ONE can fix STUPID
    W8AMR
    http://fishertrains94.webs.com/
    Christian in training

  7. #7
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    Quote Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
    for a turbo you have to watch the duration on the ex side
    yep, just as an example, the old Isky 144-200 Turbo cam has a 260 intake dururation and a 248 exhaust dururation.
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink