Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: head upgrade disappointment
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 53

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    turbo2256b is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Danville
    Posts
    86

    Quote Originally Posted by pat mccarthy View Post
    seeing how he never said were the piston was in the hole or what the real cc of the head was . and what bore size or how thick ? who know s ? 10.2???? or i may of miss the post were he said this ? not sure but i think i did ask him this back on page one ?
    Think he posed a comp figure just under 10 to 1. Calculated? Cranking interests me as far as effictive cylinder filling.

  2. #2
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    i cc every thing way to many variables for my liking on chamber size . this was after you posted tech did not know you did the math
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 09-03-2012 at 07:44 PM.
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  3. #3
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by turbo2256b View Post
    Cranking interests me as far as effictive cylinder filling.
    It interests me also. CraneCams says that about 165 psi is the limit for pump gas, but I have read of fellows who have run over 200 psi without detonation on pump gas. Never been there myself, but I'm thinkin' there could be no PCV or EGR and everything would have to be de-burred and polished to prevent pre-ignition.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  4. #4
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by techinspector1 View Post
    It interests me also. CraneCams says that about 165 psi is the limit for pump gas, but I have read of fellows who have run over 200 psi without detonation on pump gas. Never been there myself, but I'm thinkin' there could be no PCV or EGR and everything would have to be de-burred and polished to prevent pre-ignition.
    egr very well could help with a hirer cranking psi with poor fuel i ran more then 165+ psi on many build. but grade of fuel is ?
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  5. #5
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by pat mccarthy View Post
    egr very well could help with a hirer cranking psi with poor fuel
    Perhaps, but I have no interest in introducing burnt gases into the system to reduce the charge density. If you must run EGR from an emissions standpoint, then fine. But if you don't, then the whole contraption is mis-engineered in the first place if you have to use EGR to make it work.
    Last edited by techinspector1; 09-03-2012 at 07:46 PM.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  6. #6
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by techinspector1 View Post
    Perhaps, but I have no interest in introducing burnt gases into the system to reduce the charge density. If you must run EGR from an emissions standpoint, then fine. But if you don't, then the whole contraption is mis-engineered in the first place if you have to use EGR to make it work.
    well i do not but you posted it ? its done on new cars every day many make very good HP with it
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 09-03-2012 at 07:52 PM.
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink