Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: EAGLE vs. SCAT
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
  1. #1
    stirfry89's Avatar
    stirfry89 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Victoria, Texas, United States
    Posts
    58

    EAGLE vs. SCAT

     



    Any significant difference between these two??? One guy in town (possibly dummy) told me that SCAT is a knock off of EAGLE, I told him he was full of it...opinions???

    btw, let's compare their forged line...4340 cranks, 4340 rods

  2. #2
    turbo74pinto is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Willoughby
    Car Year, Make, Model: 74 pinto, 41 ford, 34 dodge
    Posts
    60

    ive heard the same thing. i dont know if its true. ive never used scat...yet. my last 347 was all eagle and it went together, balanced and ran great. ive heard the same from scat. in fact i said "yet" because i may be trying some of their stuff in my flathead build. time will tell.

    bob

  3. #3
    stirfry89's Avatar
    stirfry89 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Victoria, Texas, United States
    Posts
    58

    So you got it out of the box and assembled it in your block and started it up no problems?

  4. #4
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    I don't care who's parts I use, they get checked, measured, rechecked, eyeballed, some more measuring, clearanced, and checked a couple more times..... I've seen some of these off shore built engine pieces that should never have made it through anything even resembling quality control......... Once it's put together and breaks, it's too late to do anything about it. Definitely worth the extra effort and time to check each and every piece over carefully!!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  5. #5
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by turbo74pinto View Post
    ive heard the same thing. i dont know if its true. ive never used scat...yet. my last 347 was all eagle and it went together, balanced and ran great. ive heard the same from scat. in fact i said "yet" because i may be trying some of their stuff in my flathead build. time will tell.

    bob
    i used more Scat then Eagle maybe 50 to one on rods and same on cranks and PBM .Cats. Ohios .Rpm. Elgin others i have used as well. the forged cranks are all about the same forgings .there some are better on size and a better oiling lay out on the crank strait shot vs cross drilling .i not going to get in to this much other then to say how much work to get the crank in balance at times . some on the list are rebox cranks . i use more of the compstar line now its a 8 plate crank.i still use the scats/pbm stuff
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 10-16-2009 at 05:26 AM.
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  6. #6
    turbo74pinto is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Willoughby
    Car Year, Make, Model: 74 pinto, 41 ford, 34 dodge
    Posts
    60

    stirfry89, no, i still inspected, measured, and balanced. just as dave said. everything was very nice. if i remember correct, the balance was pretty much dead on according to my machinest.

    bob

  7. #7
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    With Eagle and SCAT, there is little difference. Both have quality parts. I have heard on other forums that CAT stuff does not have as good a finish as Eagle or SCAT, although I have no direct experience. My engine was built with an Eagle rotating assembly because that is what my machine shop sold. I have also heard very good things about the quality of Compstar products. Eagle and SCAT parts are cast/forged in China and shipped to the US where they are machined and finished. CAT is also a a foreign made product (China, I think) but I don't know where they are machined and finished.
    Last edited by rumrumm; 10-16-2009 at 06:13 AM.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  8. #8
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by rumrumm View Post
    With Eagle and SCAT, there is little difference. Both have quality parts. I have heard on other forums that CAT stuff does not have as good a finish as Eagle or SCAT, although I have no direct experience. My engine was built with an Eagle rotating assembly because that is what my machine shop sold. I have also heard very good things about the quality of Compstar products.
    well its made for and finsh by callies so it good.. as for the finsh i seen Cats that hold size and finsh better then some other and used many of the scats there size and rod weigth is better then alot and with cranks as well . eagle had some bad SBC cranks get out with a smaller then size snout get out. i look in to this alot of were they come frome forging numbers .i have cars that run low times at the track as well as truck puller .i used alot of the H beam rods and cranks from all brands out there so use what you want i know what fits the best and holds up the best so far
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 10-16-2009 at 02:47 PM.
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  9. #9
    Geezer2's Avatar
    Geezer2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Dunedin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1976 Cadillac Seville with 454 Chevy
    Posts
    421

    I have used probably 25-30 of Scats kits and the same number of Eagle kits (and/or perts) and have always found the Scat machine work to be higher quality. I ran into some Eagle cranks that had as much as a .0005 taper on the rod journals. Just bad machine work, in that case polishing.

    I prefer the Scat stuff for low cost and quality.
    Buying parts I don't need, with money I don't have, to impress people I don't like

  10. #10
    PRO53's Avatar
    PRO53 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    tomball
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1930 sedan,1953 f-100,1950 sedan
    Posts
    239

    Ive had a scat crank and there Hbeam rods in my 521 ford(jetboat) for 2yrs now, has been great so far.
    1930 model a , 1953 ford truck
    "DOWN WITH THE SICKNESS"

  11. #11
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    We use Callies and Callies Compstar mostly except they are just getting into Ford stuff. Have forged Compstar stuff on our selves and order in the Scat in both forged and cast for Chev and Ford. Sizing hasn't been the most consistant on Eagle but they have some that aren't available elsewhere---We get the Scat stuff in pallet containers of 15 cranks and sets of rods for best deal on inbound freight.

  12. #12
    John Palmer is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Santa Ana
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 High Boy, '60 VW, Teardrop Trailers
    Posts
    355

    I've been on a tour of the SCAT facility and they make many different kinds of cranks from what I could tell. Every thing from carving one out of a huge billet of steel, to machine "semi done" raw forged cranks, to what I think we are talking about here, which is "repackaged" off shore cranks which are built to their spec's. It always comes down to price, and what we are willing to pay.

    We run 86mm SCAT "flanged cranks" in our VW drag motors and have never had a "crank caused" engine failure.

    Very happy with SCAT cranks, not so happy with their flat tappet lifter pitting.

  13. #13
    Itoldyouso's Avatar
    Itoldyouso is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    fort myers
    Car Year, Make, Model: '27 ford/'39 dodge/ '23 t
    Posts
    11,033

    I haven't fired up my 331 stroker kit from Scat yet, but was impressed with the overall quality of it. I chose Scat over Eagle mainly because our first experience with them was a 1915 stroker kit in my Son Dan's VW years ago. I also felt I got good solid help on the phone from Scat when I called to ask some questions prior to buying the kit. More and more I judge a company on that gut feeling you get when you call them for any reason, and I liked the way they took time to explain some options and to dispel some myths I had heard.

    I guess time will tell if I made a good choice, but the engine went together easier than any I have done before.

    Don

  14. #14
    skyeking is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    sydney
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1974 XJ Daimler ZZ4/th700
    Posts
    18

    Hi People,
    Some years some very cheap "SCAT" cranks were for sale and looked the real
    deal. One thing was wrong. You could not bolt a flex plate /flywheel onto the
    crank because the bolt pattern was R/S..T.
    What you see isn't what you are supposed to get???...Until later..Skyeking

  15. #15
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by skyeking View Post
    Hi People,
    Some years some very cheap "SCAT" cranks were for sale and looked the real
    deal. One thing was wrong. You could not bolt a flex plate /flywheel onto the
    crank because the bolt pattern was R/S..T.
    What you see isn't what you are supposed to get???...Until later..Skyeking
    that maybe true? but i ways pickup cranks from brian at scat 4 or more at a time just got to a point were i could not move them .so i buy them one at a time for the job from Pbm or others that sell cranks like Clayton Racing i always built the kits and balanced it my self .out of many cranks i sent back one crank and one H beam rod.
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 10-20-2009 at 04:04 PM.
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink