Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 350 build-up question heads?cam?fuel injection?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    camncars is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Des Plaines
    Posts
    1

    350 build-up question heads?cam?fuel injection?

     



    I have a 1971 Camaro that I will be pulling the engine out of and trans so I can get my trans fixed and detail the engine compartment. Since the engine will be out, I plan on doing some work to it, it is in need of some new gaskets and a clean up. Here's what I got now

    4 bolt 350 block bored to 355
    Chevy pink rods balanced
    new crank
    srp forged pistons/rings
    Edelbrock Performer RPM hyd. cam
    2.02 fuely/camel hump heads
    Performer RPM intake
    Street avenger 670 holley carb
    approx 9.5 comp ratio pump gas
    basiclly the short block(bottom end) is all new and good, just looking fot the top-half build.

    I may want to get some new heads and possibly fuel injection to make it run smooth, I am sick of carbs and tuning and letting the car warm up, etc.

    I was thinking about the Performer RPM heads and the Performer RPM pro-flow fuel injection system so everything matches.

    I was told alot of different things to make more power for only a little more money (not including the injeciton unit)

    I was told to go with Dart pro1 heads and possibly a different cam to maximise the power instead of the Edelbrock cam/heads. Would this be a good idea?? if so what heads/cam would you recommend.

    With the injection in mind if I dedide to replace the carb set up, does the Edelbrock Pro-flow system work well on a set up like this. I like injection for numerous reasons, driveability, cold starts, efficiancy, etc. This unit looks fairly simple to install, use, tune, etc.

    My other details which would probablly help deciding cam/heads are,
    turbo 350 trans and a 4.11 gear, which I may swap for a 3.73 gear for slightly better hwy use, and the torque converter is about a 2300 stall approx.

    The main use for this car is a nice cruiser that is dependable, yet quick. It is not going to be strictly a race car, only want to go to the 1/4 mile track a few times a year.

    Any ideas on what to do??? I know there will be two main discussions, which heads/cam, and the induction part of it. Let me hear your ideas.

  2. #2
    Cobrasnake302 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Near O'hare
    Posts
    5

    anyone??
    ???

  3. #3
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    If you are going to go with the Edelbrock FI system, then I would use their heads. They flow well and are reasonably priced. I would look for a cam from one of the major cam companies--CompCams, Lunati, Crane, Crower--call them and get recommendations for your engine with the FI. Edelbrock cams are okay, but the aforementioned cam companies are ahead technology-wise. Compare their recommendations and go with the one that is closest to the average of all four.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  4. #4
    robot's Avatar
    robot is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tucson
    Car Year, Make, Model: 39 Ford Coupe, 32 Ford Roadster
    Posts
    2,334

    And before you buy a cam, call Edelbrock and ask what cam specifics that they recommend for this setup....Fuel Injection likes a different lobe center spacing than does a carb.

    mike in tucson

  5. #5
    MadMax's Avatar
    MadMax is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Munich
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1983 Chevy 5,7l G20
    Posts
    213

    Basically, you need two cars. I know it's what people want:
    A street car with high efficiency and good mielage, but you should also be able to race it occasionally. This won't work out really well. Period.
    This is because of the two different useages you need:
    For a street car you need high torque at low RPMs, for a race car you need high power at high RPMs.
    For high torque you need heads with a smaller intake runner volume to get a higher port velocity and better mixture of the fuel and air, but you don't want runners too big, they will kill the low end torque because of the loss of the above mentioned port velocity. For racing use you need a high volume of mitxture, which is only obtainable by having big runners. Same appiles to carb and fuel injection.
    An engine is basically an airpump. A racing airpump needs to pump a lot of air in a short time, a street airpump has to pump a small amount of air in a longer time (for efficiency). There are compromises, but a compromise is never the best of both worlds. You might get just about affordable mileage and track speed of under 15s. But you wont get 25mpg in a 12s car. Many have tried that
    One way to get about this is of course quite simple: If you really only want to race it occasionally get a set of cylinder head studs and buy two different top ends and a timing cover which allows for cam change without lowering the oil pan. Then you can change from street to track and back in half a day and have the best of both worlds. You just need a stout bottom end, which won't hurt a street car either.
    In a Camaro you have the space to work on it nicely. And don'T forget: There's more to ETs than the engine: Suspension, tires, weight, trans...
    Just my thoughts...
    Max
    Harharhar...

  6. #6
    Cobrasnake302 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Near O'hare
    Posts
    5

    Thanks. I may get the edelbrock heads and FI and already have the rpm cam, and edelbrock says it's a nicely matched combo and should have some balls, but a nice driver.

    I am still open for other ideas, especially the heads/cam, but I really want the fuel injection. For only a few hundred more dollars, I could get a different cam(not sure which one, and the dart pro1 heads, which I was told will outperform the rpm heads by quite a bit. Not sure what to do, it will be over a month till I order parts. keep the ides coming. thanks all!!!

  7. #7
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    The best flowing heads on the market are made by AFR. Their 180 heads would work great on your 355. Check them out at www.airflowresearch.com/180sbc_sh.php.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  8. #8
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by rumrumm
    The best flowing heads on the market are made by AFR. Their 180 heads would work great on your 355. Check them out at www.airflowresearch.com/180sbc_sh.php.
    I will second this.
    If I want to build a 400 to 425 hp 350/383 these would be my first choice.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink