Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 6" con. rod in 383?
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 33

Threaded View

  1. #6
    Don Shillady's Avatar
    Don Shillady is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Ashland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 29 fendered roadster
    Posts
    2,160

    http://purplesagetradingpost.com/sum...%20engine.html

    There is a reference article showing the effect of longer rods in a 350, not a 383, but the priniciple should apply to the 383 as long as you can solve the problems of the tight inner space between the crank and cam which is made even tighter with the long rods. Another good news/bad news tradeoff is that the pistons need to have higher pin positions. On the one hand that probably reduces piston rocking and side slap but on the other hand the higher pin position makes it tricky to place the rings on the piston away from the pin hole. Maybe Dave S. could build one of these within the cu in limitation for his track car. I suspect this information is out there among the track racers but it requires more than usual engine rebuild assembly so there are probably few of these engines on the street. I considered this build up but figured it was beyond my talent and wallet.

    Don Shillady
    Retired Scientist/teen rodder
    Last edited by Don Shillady; 09-24-2006 at 06:57 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink