Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 327 vs 400 argument..
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 117
  1. #61
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by lt1s10
    I don't need nobody to explain it to me, I know what your 're doing, and all you know is the valve is not hitting the piston, you don't know how close it is to the piston. it would be nice to know. hambiskit explained it to"you"this morning and you didn't pay no attention to him.

    it the same as checking the bearings with plastergauge, it dont have to be done, but you need to stop telling everybody how good a motor you build, because for what people are paying for them they're not getting their moneys worth.
    Mike,you really need to go back and read my other posts or have some one explain these things to you.Yes,I am able to tell how close the valve is to the piston.I run it until it touches the piston and subtract my gross valve lift from that number.That shows my clearance.Funny thing is this has worked for 15 or more years for me.I had two engines in modifieds that finished in the top ten in 2005 at the I.M.C.A. Supernatinals.There where over 500 cars there.Gee,I don't know.Two in the top ten.Not bad for a mid-western farm boy who does'nt know anything.I still would like some one to try and explain this to Mike.What we have here is a total lack of communication.What really is funny is you are the only one that is up-set about what I charge any I have never sold you anything.L.O.L.
    Last edited by erik erikson; 03-06-2006 at 03:37 PM.

  2. #62
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Whoops
    Last edited by erik erikson; 03-06-2006 at 03:41 PM.

  3. #63
    kitz's Avatar
    kitz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Roadster, BBC
    Posts
    962

    You engine builders ....

    Guys this ain't brain surgery.

    Both methods will work, although I too am unaware of plastigage that thick (> 20 mil). As you all know plastigage is typically used to check bearing clearances, not larger gaps. Modeling clay etc would work just fine too. Maybe even penut butter in a real pinch.

    I still respect you both. Now kiss kiss and make nice.

    Best Regards, Kitz
    Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400

  4. #64
    thesals's Avatar
    thesals is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san diego
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 mustangFB, 69 econline Drag Van
    Posts
    1,527

    Originally posted by Dave Severson
    Oh boy!!! just found out we can't pick on ricers, now we can argue about food!!! yipppppeeeeeeeee!!!!

    we cant pick on ricers?!??? why not????
    just because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day

  5. #65
    lt1s10's Avatar
    lt1s10 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    rustburg,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1997 CHEVY.S10 LT1-350
    Posts
    4,093

    Originally posted by kitz
    You engine builders ....

    Guys this ain't brain surgery.

    Both methods will work, although I too am unaware of plastigage that thick (> 20 mil). As you all know plastigage is typically used to check bearing clearances, not larger gaps. Modeling clay etc would work just fine too. Maybe even penut butter in a real pinch.

    I still respect you both. Now kiss kiss and make nice.

    Best Regards, Kitz

    this don't have anything to do with motors, i dont care how he builds his motors, its about eriks smart a*s mouth.
    i'm not gonna kiss him, but he can
    Attached Images
    Mike
    check my home page out!!!
    http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html




  6. #66
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Originally posted by erik erikson
    If the piston is at TDC and the valve is at max. lift and I open it another .060 or .080 and it does not touch the piston why would'nt I know where the valve is at?Anyone else want to try exlaining this to Mike here?Dave,Pat,Denny anyone?I give up.
    Me too, I usually like to stay at about .100 on valve to piston clearance, figure it gives me about a .020 safety cusion. I use the light springs and dial indicator method to check clearance, that along with one eye on the degree wheel, no need to double check with clay....I wasn't aware they made plasti-gage in .060 to .100 thickness ranges, never seen it at much more then .006 or so. Don't know for sure, been years since I've used it.

    Erik if these guys agreed you were right they would never say so. For whatever reason they don't like you, or me either I suppose, and I would imagine they will do their best to torpedo every post you put on here.

    As I said on the last pi**ing contest, how about we just forget the personality and ego crap and just share information that makes us all better hot rodders........
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  7. #67
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by lt1s10
    this don't have anything to do with motors, i dont care how he builds his motors, its about eriks smart a*s mouth.
    i'm not gonna kiss him, but he can
    Mike, that is very cute.The least you could do is buy me some dinner first.If you are really good you might even get a kiss BIG BOY.

  8. #68
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Well, I think I'll stick with expending my energy, time, and mental processes towards building a better hot rod...... Never did enjoy the other crap anyhow...
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  9. #69
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by Dave Severson
    Me too, I usually like to stay at about .100 on valve to piston clearance, figure it gives me about a .020 safety cusion. I use the light springs and dial indicator method to check clearance, that along with one eye on the degree wheel, no need to double check with clay....I wasn't aware they made plasti-gage in .060 to .100 thickness ranges, never seen it at much more then .006 or so. Don't know for sure, been years since I've used it.

    Erik if these guys agreed you were right they would never say so. For whatever reason they don't like you, or me either I suppose, and I would imagine they will do their best to torpedo every post you put on here.

    As I said on the last pi**ing contest, how about we just forget the personality and ego crap and just share information that makes us all better hot rodders........
    I know what it is they don't like roundy round racer's from the midwest.

  10. #70
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    PAT

     



    Pat,get on in there.We where just talking about Mike buying me dinner.

  11. #71
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    well maybe we can.not get along ? erick you may build a better engine then me ? but i have built stuff that you may have put in the dumpster and they are still running . eveyone has there way to do stuff i have tryed to get along with all of you. BUT there is one thing i do not like. making fun of any ones spelling. my spelling is very bad. all may posts need to be eddied and so it takes me time to post i do not think any one should make fun of some one problem. all this is free info for someone let them make up there mind how they want to do it. denny wanted to know how to find true center to fly cut that is easy. take a junk valve cut the head off cut a point on it put your head with no valves in it. on run the piston up TDC drop the old valve that now a punch thur the gulde and tap it this is were true center is

  12. #72
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Yup, you're right. It's all my fault. and yup, you and Mike are those guys. This thread started out as a discussion on Hot
    Rod engine building preferences, then instantly turned into a pi**ing contest. I appreciate the yellow Mustang, but if that means I have to agree with everything you and Mike say, sorry I bothered you about it. Just drop the BS and go back to hot rodding. If you and Mike don't like Erik, what in the heck difference does it make? Does it justify attacking everything he sez??? And of course now I'm the A**hole, Erik has a smart mouth, and no one should ever have a difference of opinion with someone just because they're older??? That's BS and you know it.... Now just drop it, ok????? When it comes to taking sides, always show me on the side of building a better Hot Rod.......
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  13. #73
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by DennyW
    Erik, I got a few dog biscuits for your supper. Now go lay down, and behaive.
    RUFF,RUFF,not until Mike takes me to dinner.

  14. #74
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Originally posted by Dave Severson
    Yup, you're right. It's all my fault. and yup, you and Mike are those guys. This thread started out as a discussion on Hot
    Rod engine building preferences, then instantly turned into a pi**ing contest. I appreciate the yellow Mustang, but if that means I have to agree with everything you and Mike say, sorry I bothered you about it. Just drop the BS and go back to hot rodding. If you and Mike don't like Erik, what in the heck difference does it make? Does it justify attacking everything he sez??? And of course now I'm the A**hole, Erik has a smart mouth, and no one should ever have a difference of opinion with someone just because they're older??? That's BS and you know it.... Now just drop it, ok????? When it comes to taking sides, always show me on the side of building a better Hot Rod.......
    As with the last thread that degraded to this level, best thing that could happen is that one of the moderator's lock the flippin' thing down, and let it slowly die a natural death.....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  15. #75
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by Dave Severson
    Yup, you're right. It's all my fault. and yup, you and Mike are those guys. This thread started out as a discussion on Hot
    Rod engine building preferences, then instantly turned into a pi**ing contest. I appreciate the yellow Mustang, but if that means I have to agree with everything you and Mike say, sorry I bothered you about it. Just drop the BS and go back to hot rodding. If you and Mike don't like Erik, what in the heck difference does it make? Does it justify attacking everything he sez??? And of course now I'm the A**hole, Erik has a smart mouth, and no one should ever have a difference of opinion with someone just because they're older??? That's BS and you know it.... Now just drop it, ok????? When it comes to taking sides, always show me on the side of building a better Hot Rod.......
    Dave,I thought I was the A--hole.No,wait I am the smart a--.

Reply To Thread
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink