Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Hot Rod 283, is it possible?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Ayers27 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Boaz
    Posts
    34

    Hot Rod 283, is it possible?

     



    I have a serious question here, is it possible to make a 283 into a formidable street motor?

    I ask because I found a nice little 72 Chevy Long wheelbase with a 283.

    What I want to know is, with a new cam, heads, intake, carb and exhaust, it is possible to make a stout 283?

    I mean Mustangs ran hog wild with a 289, but then again that was a really light car.

  2. #2
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Re: Hot Rod 283, is it possible?

     



    Originally posted by Ayers27
    I have a serious question here, is it possible to make a 283 into a formidable street motor?

    I ask because I found a nice little 72 Chevy Long wheelbase with a 283.

    What I want to know is, with a new cam, heads, intake, carb and exhaust, it is possible to make a stout 283?

    I mean Mustangs ran hog wild with a 289, but then again that was a really light car.
    Yes, but you would be much better off building a 383 to get the heavy truck moving.

  3. #3
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    You would have to wind it way too hard and it wouldn't pull the truck worth a darn. They have little torque and don't make HP until high into the rpm range.
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  4. #4
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by camaro_fever68
    You would have to wind it way too hard and it wouldn't pull the truck worth a darn. They have little torque and don't make HP until high into the rpm range.
    Good, finally something we both agree on.

  5. #5
    Ayers27 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Boaz
    Posts
    34

    what is with all the love for 383s lately. But in that case, I'll just build up my 83 long wheelbase which I already have. Why buy a truck to rip it apart when I can rip apart a truck I already have.

    Then again I do have a 350 block already bored .30 over.


    My old man is against 383s for some reason, he is very odd about his motor choices.

  6. #6
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Originally posted by Ayers27
    what is with all the love for 383s lately. But in that case, I'll just build up my 83 long wheelbase which I already have. Why buy a truck to rip it apart when I can rip apart a truck I already have.

    Then again I do have a 350 block already bored .30 over.


    My old man is against 383s for some reason, he is very odd about his motor choices.
    The rip and roar surrounding the 383 is the extra cubes it offers which returns in more torque and HP and is as easy and cheap to build as a 350 with the aftermarket the way it is.
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  7. #7
    Ayers27 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Boaz
    Posts
    34

    yea I knew that, I was trying to be funny. 383s are stout motors, but maybe a little too stout for what I want.

  8. #8
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by camaro_fever68
    The rip and roar surrounding the 383 is the extra cubes it offers which returns in more torque and HP and is as easy and cheap to build as a 350 with the aftermarket the way it is.
    O.K.,that is now two things I agree with you on 100%.

  9. #9
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by Ayers27
    what is with all the love for 383s lately. But in that case, I'll just build up my 83 long wheelbase which I already have. Why buy a truck to rip it apart when I can rip apart a truck I already have.

    Then again I do have a 350 block already bored .30 over.


    My old man is against 383s for some reason, he is very odd about his motor choices.
    I would ask your dad why he is against a 383.

  10. #10
    Ayers27 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Boaz
    Posts
    34

    Don't get me wrong, he thinks they are great for drag racing and everything, but for the street I guess he feels it is a bit much, for me anyway.

  11. #11
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Originally posted by erik erikson
    O.K.,that is now two things I agree with you on 100%.
    I guess you got something worth while to say every now and then. lol just kidding, don't get bent up.
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  12. #12
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by Ayers27
    Don't get me wrong, he thinks they are great for drag racing and everything, but for the street I guess he feels it is a bit much, for me anyway.
    So run a small RV cam that is done at 4,500 and have some fun burning up the tires.

  13. #13
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by camaro_fever68
    I guess you got something worth while to say every now and then. lol just kidding, don't get bent up.
    You have made some really good posts tonight.I have agreed with what you said on the 383 100 %.

  14. #14
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    "My old man is against 383s for some reason, he is very odd about his motor choices."

    He is just like all other fathers everywhere. He doesn't want you to get killed at such a tender age (17/18).

    My son and I built a fast truck for him to have fun with in High School, but I built a cage, window net and 5-point belts into it and made him use them.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink