Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: ford c6 variations and HP rebuilds
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Tommie's Avatar
    Tommie is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    langraaf
    Car Year, Make, Model: '66 t-bird coupé
    Posts
    89

    ford c6 variations and HP rebuilds

     



    hello people!
    well, after I finished up, building my engine...with a certain degree of satisfaction It's now time to put some strain and effort in the transmission!

    What I have, is a genuine 1966 casting C6 with FE bellhousing. Now, what I want to know is, how much do the C6 castings differ, over the years they were made?
    For instance:
    I got a remark this week, that a new "Superior super servo" wouldn't fit my '66 casting and there is no other servo upgrade either (the Ford's R-code version, is what I would like to use) for this casting?

    I'm not going to blast a 1000HP at it, but I would like a HP-rebuild, with an all-over better performance, capable of handling around 500 HP and mainly street use. (I.E. no transbrake or full manual, but firmer shifts and the lower gearratio as well!)
    I got the advice that a '66 casting isn't what you want to have for this kind of a rebuild...

    problem is, it's what I have...and living in the netherlands, means; either buy and ship another from the states and do my work on that, or try and do my thing with what I have...guess what I prefer?!

    grtz,
    Tom
    Going sideways through a bend isn't considered normal or even sane, so that's the way I like it!

  2. #2
    shoprat's Avatar
    shoprat is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Orange
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 RANCHERO
    Posts
    261

    C6

     



    Is the 66 diff from 67 or 8?. I've run them old C6's in 4000 lbs car in the 11's
    2500 lb Falcon 10.20's w/brake. never a problem.
    good luck, Ron

  3. #3
    Tommie's Avatar
    Tommie is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    langraaf
    Car Year, Make, Model: '66 t-bird coupé
    Posts
    89

    Quote Originally Posted by DennyW
    The 66 is different than 67 and later. They are pretty beefy though. Get a shift kit, a beefy band, and smaller end steels so you can add a couple more clutches. It should hold 500 hp. Check a couple places like TCI for beefy parts to add.
    so it's mainly that the casing isn't as rigid as the newer years?
    I was indeed thinking of putting in some thinner end steels and add some clutches.
    Going sideways through a bend isn't considered normal or even sane, so that's the way I like it!

  4. #4
    Tommie's Avatar
    Tommie is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    langraaf
    Car Year, Make, Model: '66 t-bird coupé
    Posts
    89

    Quote Originally Posted by shoprat
    Is the 66 diff from 67 or 8?. I've run them old C6's in 4000 lbs car in the 11's
    2500 lb Falcon 10.20's w/brake. never a problem.
    good luck, Ron
    well, to be accurate...the C6 casting code starts with: C6...
    (RF-C6AP-7006 to be complete)
    no, seriously! It does! so it's a 1966 casting, not any younger than that!
    Going sideways through a bend isn't considered normal or even sane, so that's the way I like it!

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink