lt1s10 . . .

I think you're reading something into my post that wasn't there. I was careful to say "no lack of respect intended" and I "respectfully disagree," and really meant that. Your post and John's post took the position that mechanical gauges were more accurate. I don't believe that, and I wanted to give Ted the other side of the story. After all, he did ask for information.

I also ended my post with another statement about not intending to start an argument - just expressing my opinion. If I disagree with information in a thread, I'm likely to say so, and I try to be as diplomatic about it as I can.

I'm sorry you took offense. That wasn't my intent.