Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: newbie at this..obviously
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    sixtyfourss is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Pflugerville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1964 Chevy Impala S/S
    Posts
    6

    newbie at this..obviously

     



    I have recently purchased a '64 Impala SS... the car has 70,000 original miles. I have plenty of expertise in body/paint...but need info on the motor/exhaust. The car is completely original with interior only one month old. The undercarriage is immaculate. I don't want to race the car...but want plenty of horsepower and a great sound (exhaust) from my car...any help???

    Thanks for all suggestions

  2. #2
    drg84's Avatar
    drg84 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Dansville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1996 Aurora Autobahn edition
    Posts
    1,201

    Tune up, good air system, true dual exhaust with turbo mufflers or glass packs. if you dont want to attract the cops, go with the TMs. If its been sitting, a carb rebuild may save you a lot of headaches later. or a swap to an edelbrock. I assume its a 283?
    Right engine, Wrong Wheels

  3. #3
    pro70z28's Avatar
    pro70z28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    CC
    Car Year, Make, Model: 70 Camaro Z-28 Now/40 Chevy Back Then
    Posts
    4,306

    What does it have in it now. ... 327 ? Maybe 4 spd. ?
    "PLAN" your life like you will live to 120.
    "LIVE" your life like you could die tomorrow.

    John 3:16
    >>>>>>

  4. #4
    sixtyfourss is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Pflugerville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1964 Chevy Impala S/S
    Posts
    6

    it's a 327 with a 4 spd...thanks

  5. #5
    pro70z28's Avatar
    pro70z28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    CC
    Car Year, Make, Model: 70 Camaro Z-28 Now/40 Chevy Back Then
    Posts
    4,306

    Originally posted by sixtyfourss
    it's a 327 with a 4 spd...thanks
    I would start with drg84's suggestions.
    "PLAN" your life like you will live to 120.
    "LIVE" your life like you could die tomorrow.

    John 3:16
    >>>>>>

  6. #6
    Mike P's Avatar
    Mike P is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SW Arizona
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Ply Valiant, 83 El Camino
    Posts
    3,787

    Ah yes, the 64 Chevy, last year of the X frame. The factory location of the mufflers tend to make for very long tail pipes. Just one old farts opinion , but for a really neat and nostalgic sound nothing sounds better than a pair of burned out glass packs on one of these. Your not going to be real popular with the muffler shop that bends the pipes, 2 1/2" is doable but it's kind of a weird bend over the rear axel, 2 1/4" is easier and is more than enough for a 327.

    I don't know if headers are still available for these, but the shory one fit well and might be the way to go.

    Depending on what's on the car now, a good aftermarket intake and 650 CFM carb should be good for some HP over the stock pieces.

    Stopping is also a good thing, if it hasn't been done a disc brake conversion is also a good idea.

    On your earlier AC question, DRG84 sugestion for a factory AC set up is a pretty good one. I've done a couple of Vintage Air AC installs (not a a 64 Chevy though) and the kits I've delt with have been good units. No matter what unit you go with, I would recommend a Sanden radial compressor (they come in the Vintage Air kits) as they eat considerably less HP.

    Godd luck on your project.

  7. #7
    hambiskit is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Shelton
    Posts
    693

    Well Tech, Do we agree on a small block for once?? Close enough, except lose the long stroke crank, and go with a 307, or a 327 steel crank ( shorter stroke ), and use 327 flat top piston & rods in that block, (changes the crossover). NOW your talkin'.
    Jim

  8. #8
    hambiskit is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Shelton
    Posts
    693

    Your right.....I do favor the shorter stroke crank. She sure spins up quicker, but until I get it to the Dyno I guess I'll have no grounds to compare.
    Are those numbers correct - so that I can compare?
    Jim

  9. #9
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    I would go with Tech on this, on a barge that size and weight gonna take a ton of torque to get the thing moving. IMHO, a short stroke hi revvin' motor should be in a car weighing 2500 pounds or less. Just my 2 cents worth.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink