Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 48 Chevy 1/2 ton
          
   
   

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Don Meyer is offline Moderator Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    St Cloud
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 GMC trk & a 66 Rolls Royce
    Posts
    532

    I have built over 30 streetrods & have used many IFS. I was one of the first to install a Must II IFS back in the 70's before kits were available.
    There have been failures of the Must II because it is hard to duplicate the original installation of the strut rod. The new strutless lower A arms are not as strong as the factory units( in my humble opinion). The load is distribuated over a small area. This view comes from one w/a background in mech engr.
    The GM clip has a very wide stance & the lower control arm distribues the load over a large area. One can see the difference if the two units are side by side.
    I currently am building my 3rd 48 Chevy trk & it was a no brainer to install a 84 Buick Regal IFS.
    Don
    Ps if i were to buy a Must II IFS kit I would not chose Fat Man's.
    Last edited by Don Meyer; 07-08-2004 at 11:17 AM.
    Don Meyer, PhD-Mech Engr(48 GMC Trk/chopped/cab extended/caddy fins & a GM converted Rolls Royce Silver Shadow).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink