Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Ford 9" rear end questions
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    I'm pretty sure that all the early Ford cars used a 56 1/2" track, same as the width of two horse's butts pulling a Roman chariot and the same gauge as a railroad track. "Track" would be center to center of the tires on the same axle. Since you're probably not going to run the skinny litte stock tires or use the same wheel offset as Henry did, anything from 56 1/2" to 59 1/2" (1 1/2" difference per side) should work fine, depending on wheel backset and width.

    From a rodder with a Model A fenderless roadster....
    "I have an early Bronco 9" rear end ( 66-77). It measures 58" wheel mounting surface to wheel mounting surface.This is in a fenderless '30 model A roadster with 10" tires on 8" rims with 5 1/4" back space. This works well IMHO as I don't like the tires sticking out too far nor in too far. If you're going to run reversed wheels you may want to go with 56". 56-58" is a good range for this type of car."

    From a rodder who used an 8.8" in a '40.
    "I bought some new ones from a ford supplier from 2002 explorers that had disc brakes and 3.55 gears, 31 spline axles , they measure 59 1/2 face to face . we put one in the 40 sedan and it was perfect. also fit 55 chevy very good." (remember, all early Fords up through '48 were built on a 56 1/2" track, so anything that will fit a '40 will fit an A. Also, 2002 Explorer and probably other year Explorers with an 8.8" would have 5-lug wheels from the factory).

    80's V8 Mustangs with drum brakes will have the narrowest 8.8" differentials and could have Traction Lock differentials.

    If you get anywhere close, you can finish the width with wheels having a different backset measurement.

    Here's a good article on the 8.8" unit, telling how to convert 4-lug to 5-lug.....
    The Ford 8.8 Mustang Rear End - Car Craft Magazine

    And another good article on the Explorer 8.8"....
    http://www.therangerstation.com/tech...lorer8_8.shtml

    Oh, and the correct nomenclature for the "chunk" is "third member" or "pig".

    Personally, I'd be thinkin' Jaguar or Thunderbird IRS, but hey, whatever blows your skirt up.

    .
    Last edited by techinspector1; 05-12-2015 at 11:04 AM.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink