Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree11Likes

Thread: MS II front end cross memeber
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    Navy7797 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Seguin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1940 Ford p/u
    Posts
    727

    MS II front end cross memeber

     



    Having read some stories about MS II front ends being weak and breaking along the welds and other places I have a question for users of MS II after market front ends.
    Are seeing any problems with yours and are they similar to this one pictured ?

    2nd I'm thinking of boxing in the open area to add strength, any thoughts on that ?

    thanks for the inputs.

  2. #2
    chopt50wgn is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pottstown
    Posts
    169

    I have a Fatman front stub on my 50 Ply wagon. It has the MS2 dropped spindles and tubular A-arms w/coilovers. It rides like a new car and I haven't had any problems with it.
    IMO..........alot depends on who's stuff you buy. I will always stick with a brand name when it comes to anything structural like chassis parts. I also do my homework and check with other friends who use chassis parts from all the different manufacturers.
    ted dehaan and glennsexton like this.

  3. #3
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    10,989

    Navy, I have no experience with them, but I think that a well formed boxing plate to close in that area can't hurt.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  4. #4
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,844

    The inter-web is a wonderful place, but can also be populated with an abundance of trolls who deal in speculation/rumor/outright falsehoods. Sorting real experience from opinion can be tough, even when folks claim to have "experience". That being said, MII front end kits are similar to '32 glass bodies, lots of sketchy people got into the "business" of selling the stuff when the market was really hot a few years back. Odds are there are some crap parts out there built down to a price instead of up to a quality standard. As Tom said, a name brand product with a long history is a safer bet. Add to that the questions of who installed it, what their skill level is, and even do they know how to weld properly? Further the arguments over the years about whether a "Pinto" based suspension was heavy duty enough for application X. First the Pinto/MII was heavier than many think, some versions near mid 3000# range, and that was with all of the engine weight centered over the suspension rather than mostly behind it as in most rod applications. And then there's the matter of what gauge material was used in the fab of the aftermarket pieces. Lots of variables to consider.

    I've been a Heidt's fan for years because their stuff is proven and looks good to boot. They've worked for me, not interested in any other brand. Others have demonstrated their products are well made, I just don't see a reason to deviate from a known, successful product.

    As for the setup you pictured, there probably isn't much useable strength to be gained from capping that hole, but as Roger said, what can it hurt? If nothing else you would eliminate a cavity that will catch all manner of road debris
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

  5. #5
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    The MII was a well-designed IFS if you built it with the strut rod that is was designed to use, but some of the fellows who were apparently more interested in making a buck than they were turning out well-designed systems, decided to eliminate the rod and make up their own lower arm designs. In my opinion, that's where the trouble started. In most of the systems I have seen, there is insufficient support front to rear because of the narrow attachment of the lower arm to the crossmember/frame. And again, in my opinion, if you lack a degree in mechanical engineering, you have no business building independent front suspension systems. Used like the factory engineers designed it, there should be no problems.

    .
    Last edited by techinspector1; 04-30-2015 at 09:34 AM.
    NTFDAY and cffisher like this.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  6. #6
    Henry Rifle's Avatar
    Henry Rifle is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Little Elm
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford Low Boy w/ZZ430 Clone
    Posts
    3,890

    I used a Progressive Automotive crossmember back in the early 80's when I built this all-steel A-bone tudor. Note that I did use the original strut rods. The only modification I made was to fabricate tubular upper-control arms and narrow the installation 1" to fit under the Model A fenders. Back then, this was fairly new technology, and I was concerned with the strength of using both upper AND and lower A-arms. I wasn't 100% thrilled with the look of it, but with full fenders, it really didn't show that much.

    This A-bone had a 454 Chevy, Toploader 4-speed and 4:10 gears. I had no trouble running mid to low 12's with it, the geometry aligned perfectly and it ran straight as a die on both the strip and the highway.

    All that being said, I wouldn't hesitate to use a Heidt's or Pete and Jake's M-II clone IFS.

    30-5.jpg

    a-arm2.jpg
    Jack

    Gone to Texas

  7. #7
    cffisher's Avatar
    cffisher is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Constantine
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 chevy 2 dr wagon
    Posts
    9,476

    As Tech said the factory ones didn't have problems. The backyard engineers will get you killed. They came with bracing and its because it is needed. Never had any problems with them
    Charlie
    Lovin' what I do and doing what I love
    Some guys can fix broken NO ONE can fix STUPID
    W8AMR
    http://fishertrains94.webs.com/
    Christian in training

  8. #8
    Navy7797 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Seguin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1940 Ford p/u
    Posts
    727

    Here's the results of thinking and reading inputs.
    36 sedan likes this.

  9. #9
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,606

    That end cap came out great. Can't barely see the joint. Good work.

  10. #10
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    10,989

    The boxing plate may or may not be "necessary", but it's sure a lot cleaner than it was without the plate. Well done!
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  11. #11
    Navy7797 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Seguin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1940 Ford p/u
    Posts
    727

    Thanks for the inputs guys !

  12. #12
    Deuce4dad is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Southern
    Posts
    116

    You most definitely didn't hurt it. And it does look nice. The added plate gives it a much nicer finished look. Great job!

  13. #13
    shine's Avatar
    shine is online now CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    bluff dale texas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 47 inderweed
    Posts
    2,109

    i have replaced 3 mll cross members because of fatigue cracks. fatmans wont do this because it is heavy wall tubing . the others are made from 1/8 flat welded together . i do not trust them nor will i install another one.

  14. #14
    Matthyj's Avatar
    Matthyj is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Clinton
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford Hi Boy, '37 wildrod sedan
    Posts
    561

    Put in 4 or so, no problems but they all have been boxed where yours was not, one big problem mentioned on another forum from a expert was that there is no 4000 Mustang II's, and we tend to put these on heavier cars than the original design which could be beefed up a little. With that being said and many using strutless lower a arms. and then the back spacer isn't supported and fatigues the integrity of the crossmember. The solution is to add a bracket and put the through bolt in double shear on the lower pivot. On my latest car I did this because the weight of the hemi I put in, made me feel a little better when I hit a large bump, the picture is off another site and nothing I have done but you can see the bracket going from the frame to the back of the bolt, pretty easy to do and extra safety. Best of Luck Matthyj
    1960StudebakerHawk005-1.jpg
    36 sedan likes this.
    Why is mine so big and yours so small, Chrysler FirePower

  15. #15
    Deuce4dad is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Southern
    Posts
    116

    As Tech and Shine mentioned, the aftermarket manufactures moved away from the Ford control arm and strut rod design that used larger and more flexible bushing materials and now have issues with stress cracks in the crossmember using the small control arm bushings that are very rigid. This transfers more of the impact to the crossmember and brackets, causing the fatigue and cracking issues. Some manufacturers have better designs than others, but all may eventually crack out depending a great deal on road conditions and miles driven. 1/4" wall crossmembers welded to 1/8" wall frame rail; where is the crack going to start? Just a thought.
    Last edited by Deuce4dad; 05-14-2015 at 06:21 AM.

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink