Hybrid View
-
02-01-2008 01:22 PM #1
Oh yeah I've heard of it but the numbers have not been reliable and what I have seen (like above) are just not significant. What you need to do is change everything over, get some good mileage numbers, and then do a complete cost analysis based on all your results. Then get back with us on all the results.
kitz, (head master of the 'do as I say, not as I do' club for men)
Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400
-
02-01-2008 01:27 PM #2
well thats why i'm doing it to test it like i said it'll be this one time and one time only unless you really do save then i will stick with but i'll post the overall cost but i want to see if i can get above 20 mpg with my jimmy
Originally Posted by kitz
i don't know how big the tank is i think 15 gal. but every 200 miles you have to fill it upDerek Doble
-
02-01-2008 01:32 PM #3
Well I do believe it will lower internal losses due to rubbing friction, especially in the elastohydrodynamic friction arena. So in theory what Denny has actually seen should be true.
KitzJon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400






LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Yep. It’s pretty sad.
Dead!