Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: selecting motor- SBC or SBF
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    fusion_ta66 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    17

    51 ford sedan- selecting motor- SBC or SBF

     



    I just picked up a 1951 Ford sedan. The car will have a M-II front clip. The guy who is installing it for me has asked me what motor + trans I plan to put in it. I was debating between a small block chevy (350 probably) or a small block ford (5.0 or 4.6). I was thinking also about going with a fuel injected motor (maybe out of a newer mustang or camaro). Any reason I should go one way or the other? Or is it just personal preference at this point? Any way easier or cheaper? Does one brand have a better tranny to choose from (auto)?
    Last edited by fusion_ta66; 10-05-2005 at 08:52 AM.

  2. #2
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    Chevy's are cheaper to overhaul and hop up. That said, I wouldn't put one in a Ford. My choice would be (surprise!) a 351 Windsor!

  3. #3
    Hopper111 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Lawton/Ft. Sill, OK
    Car Year, Make, Model: '87 Chev Silverado/'72 Elky
    Posts
    483

    I would go with a stroked 5-0 but thats JMO.

  4. #4
    Ives Bradley's Avatar
    Ives Bradley is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    stoutland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 49 Ford tudor
    Posts
    247

    Yep 302 or Windsor.
    Choose your battles well===If it dont go chrome it

  5. #5
    Aster's Avatar
    Aster is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    CC
    Car Year, Make, Model: 30 Ford Coupe
    Posts
    110

    Good question and just in time. I'm building a 30 Ford coupe and had planned on putting my 350 w/700r4 in it but I just found out a friend of mine has a 70's something 302 w/auto in a van. The van is trash but the engine runs good. I've always been a GM man but thought the Ford tradition would stay alive with the 302 and also break away from the mainstream by going with the 302. I like the fact that the distributor is up front on the 302 so it's easy to get to. I think, as a result, there is more junk on the front of the engine setting it back further...I think, like I say I'm not a Ford man. The tranny would be a 3 speed as opposed to my 4 speed 700r4. If you run a high gear 8 or 9 inch Ford rearend, then that would change driveability quite a bit. Any other ideas?

  6. #6
    FMXhellraiser's Avatar
    FMXhellraiser is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Car Year, Make, Model: 46 Chrysler,49 Ford,66 F100,68 Lincoln
    Posts
    2,835

    Well IMO I like to keep Ford in a Ford and Chevy in a Chevy. Chevy are much cheap to build in the end. If you want to go with a 302 then a 302 and a nicely built C4 tranny is a good choice. The C6's in a 302 are way to big and heavy and not needed. If you have a heavy car then a 351 Windsor is a better choice because I have a 302 in a 66 F100 and I have to push that motor hard to get it going real good. I mean, yeah it will smoke the tires, etc but if I had a 351 I wouldn't have to push it as hard and get the same results. So if you want a 351 then get a C6 behind it. They even have stroker kits for a 351 to make a 427 if wanted as well.
    www.streamlineautocare.com

    If you wan't something done right, then you have to do it yourself!

  7. #7
    FMXhellraiser's Avatar
    FMXhellraiser is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Car Year, Make, Model: 46 Chrysler,49 Ford,66 F100,68 Lincoln
    Posts
    2,835

    Originally posted by Aster
    Good question and just in time. I'm building a 30 Ford coupe and had planned on putting my 350 w/700r4 in it but I just found out a friend of mine has a 70's something 302 w/auto in a van. The van is trash but the engine runs good. I've always been a GM man but thought the Ford tradition would stay alive with the 302 and also break away from the mainstream by going with the 302. I like the fact that the distributor is up front on the 302 so it's easy to get to. I think, as a result, there is more junk on the front of the engine setting it back further...I think, like I say I'm not a Ford man. The tranny would be a 3 speed as opposed to my 4 speed 700r4. If you run a high gear 8 or 9 inch Ford rearend, then that would change driveability quite a bit. Any other ideas?
    Aster, I have not done this myself but hear good things.... Stroke a 302 to a 347 street fighter stroker kit. I have a book on small block ford strokers and it gives TONS of good info on them. I talked to some people that used to have a 302 and drove it and then later stroked it and put it back in the same car/truck and it made a HUGE difference they said. Some people swear by the 347's and would rather have one of them than a 351W. I thought about just stroking mine and leaving it in my 66 in about 2 years but thinking of going with a 351W now and a built C6. The 347 with my C4 would be pretty nice in a T bucket though.
    www.streamlineautocare.com

    If you wan't something done right, then you have to do it yourself!

  8. #8
    Swifster's Avatar
    Swifster is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sterling Heights
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1964 Studebaker Commander
    Posts
    440

    Put a Ford in your Ford. I'd go with a 4.6L, a 351W or a 460. 460 are cheap and have a variety of parts for them. If you go the 4.6L route, get a DOHC.
    ---Tom

    1964 Studebaker Commander
    1964 Studebaker Daytona

  9. #9
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    Stock cubes are much cheaper than stroker kits. A 302 has the same bore as a 351W, so what possible advantage would there be to a 347? Unless you're trying to fool someone into thinking its still a 302.

  10. #10
    Aster's Avatar
    Aster is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    CC
    Car Year, Make, Model: 30 Ford Coupe
    Posts
    110

    Well, if I go GM, its no cost because I already have it. 350/700r4. The Ford stuff I would have to buy.....hummmmm. The Ford thing sounds good but the bank account is already stretched thinner than a nats ear over a rain barrel. Oh well, unless the 302 guy makes me a hell of a deal, I think I better stay with the GM stuff. Thanks for the creative ideas. Makes for a good mind build.

  11. #11
    FMXhellraiser's Avatar
    FMXhellraiser is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Car Year, Make, Model: 46 Chrysler,49 Ford,66 F100,68 Lincoln
    Posts
    2,835

    Noone ever said you couldn't out the GM stuff in it for now and start slowly building a Ford motor and tranny on a stand in the meantime as money and time allows. That is what I am going to do with the 351W and C6 tranny I want to put in this 66 one day in about 2 years or less.
    www.streamlineautocare.com

    If you wan't something done right, then you have to do it yourself!

  12. #12
    FL25T's Avatar
    FL25T is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Port St. Lucie
    Car Year, Make, Model: 25 T Bucket
    Posts
    8

    I'm building a t-bucket with a stoked, blown 302 and a t-5 and have to agree with the Ford in a Ford motto. Having said that, Rodding is all about doing what seems right to you. On a comparison note, the Ford small block is about 50 pounds lighter than a GM. Does that outweigh the cost differences in a buildup? Not likely. If you're looking for something a little different, think about a double overhead cam 4.6.... Say out of a Lincoln Mark VIII. The 92's came stock at about 265hp and the later years picked up somewhere around 25-30hp over that. Really wind it up and stroke IT (I've seen some new stroker kits for them). I have a Mark VIII and can't wait for the wife to tire of it so I can steal that motor..... It's WAY too much fun!

  13. #13
    FMXhellraiser's Avatar
    FMXhellraiser is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Car Year, Make, Model: 46 Chrysler,49 Ford,66 F100,68 Lincoln
    Posts
    2,835

    Have any pictures of your T Bucket? Sounds awsome.
    www.streamlineautocare.com

    If you wan't something done right, then you have to do it yourself!

  14. #14
    Ed ke6bnl is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Agua Dulce, So. Calif.
    Car Year, Make, Model: 50 ford F1, 53 chevy AD 3100, 48 Ford F1
    Posts
    90

    Originally posted by Aster
    Well, if I go GM, its no cost because I already have it. 350/700r4. The Ford stuff I would have to buy.....hummmmm. The Ford thing sounds good but the bank account is already stretched thinner than a nats ear over a rain barrel. Oh well, unless the 302 guy makes me a hell of a deal, I think I better stay with the GM stuff. Thanks for the creative ideas. Makes for a good mind build.
    In my Ford 50F1 I put in a 327 vette motor with a 700r4 the rear is ford 9". Cheaper and simpler but you live with the truest being upset and I like that. I have extra chevey and and interchageabel part laying around cheap again. easier to get the oil pan around the mustangII crossmember. do what you want not what others want Ed ke6bnl
    Ed ke6bnl@juno.com
    1963 Ford Econoline 5 window
    1950 Ford F1 pu
    1948 Ford F3 pu
    1953 Chevy 3100 AD
    1970 Chevy Short bed c10
    1972 El Camino chopped top

  15. #15
    49BizCoupe is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1949 Ford Business Coupe
    Posts
    8

    One more thing to consider is that the Ford 5.0 is couple of inches narrower than the SBC. Depending on what steering box setup you end up with you will have more clearance with the Ford motor and thus more options for headers. Im putting a 351W in my '49 with MII.

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink