Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Old Ford Parts
          
   
   

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Threaded View

  1. #3
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,898

    Quote Originally Posted by oldmanscar
    yeah Vern Tardel that was the name he asked me to look up.

    Thanks A lot! For the Help.

    I still can't figure out why all the different years. I figure certain parts were just made better in certain years.

    Thanks again
    Let me make my best guess as to why he's looking for these parts. He's probably trying to assemble a Model A bodied car the "old fashioned" way.

    Model A frame - it's the same configuration for each of those years, and the easiest/best fit for a Model A body.

    '32 K member - Model A frames are pretty "flexible", a very basic ladder style, with essentially three straight across crossmembers. Not much for resisting twist or stagger movement. A K member gives additional cross bracing on a diagonal, and was an old trick for "strengthening" an A frame.

    '33-4 wishbones - part of the componentry that maintains location of the front axle. Good fit for locating with the K member replacing the stock Model A center crossmember.

    F1 steering box and column - better design gearing for easier and more positive steering, but has a similar shape to the original Model A box so is an easy fit with minimal modification.

    Rear radius rods - basically a good fit because of length, and work with the existing bracketry on the next item rear ends.

    '35-41 rear end - stronger than the Model A, easier to adapt hydraulic brakes ('39 and up have them already). Not sure about why he'd want the '42 +, as I recall they're wider, but if he's going fenderless that's less of an issue. All of these use a torque tube enclosed drive shaft which is out of whack with some of the following trans choices, namely the post '41 pickup which is an open drive line (no torque tube)

    Transmissions - beginning in '39 there was better gearing, slightly more strength for power support. But '39 was last floor shift model, the rest were setup for column shifting through a side plate rather than top plate (or aka top loader vs side loader). Then the notation above about driveline config.

    If you read Bishop's book it will make more sense since he goes into a lot more detail.
    Last edited by Bob Parmenter; 12-30-2006 at 11:42 PM.
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink