Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree226Likes

Thread: Does this qualify as a Hot Rod?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 615

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Fauxre's Avatar
    Fauxre is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vacaville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '62 Velo Rossa
    Posts
    286

    It's amazing how politicians can be manipulated. The car hobbyist is such a small part of the automotive industry, yet environmental groups have persuaded government that hotrods and home build vehicles are such a huge menace that they need to be regulated.

    Now I'm not saying that an any unsafe piece of junk should be allowed on the roads, but an individual building a single car for his own enjoyment, shouldn't have to meet the same standards as the original manufacturer that is selling tens of thousands of units to the uneducated (in automotive terms) public.

    I think California's process is at least reasonable. Basic safety checks, brakes and lights, and a way to maintain some air quality without overburdening the home builder.
    34_40 likes this.
    Wes
    You don't have to be crazy to do this...
    ... but it helps!

  2. #2
    Fauxre's Avatar
    Fauxre is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vacaville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '62 Velo Rossa
    Posts
    286

    Quote Originally Posted by Fauxre View Post
    ...I think California's process is at least reasonable. Basic safety checks, brakes and lights, and a way to maintain some air quality without overburdening the home builder.
    Having said that, I am reminded of a story conveyed to me when I did an engine swap many years ago. It illustrates the incongruity between some of the California Smog requirements.

    This guy did an engine swap into a late '60 something (smog controlled at the time of the swap) Ranchero. He used the entire 5.0 power train from a '90 something Mustang GT. Smog regulations require all the original smog equipment from the 'Stang be present on the Ranchero. So he ran dual exhaust with two catalytic converters, exactly like the 'Stang. When tested it's emissions levels were way under the limits for the strict '90 something year of the engine. However, it failed the visual inspection because of the catalytic converters. Seems, smog regulations will not allow retrofitting a car with catalytic converters. Why? No one at BAR could give an answer. So the cats were removed and the Ranchero retested. It now passed the visual inspection just fine, but it pumped out multiple times more emissions. Failed, right?? Wrong!! Turns out it only had to meet the standards of the year of the Ranchero. Which it just barely did.


    Go figure...
    Wes
    You don't have to be crazy to do this...
    ... but it helps!

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink