Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Hi. Prepare your-selves for a barrage of questions on 350 chevys from this rookie!
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Don Shillady's Avatar
    Don Shillady is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Ashland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 29 fendered roadster
    Posts
    2,160

    Well Lobster in your major you will be able to learn a lot of theoretical stuff about engines and do a good job on your 350 buildup, but I know little about the rest of the chassis on a Rover. Interestingly there is a guy here in Ashland Va who has been doing a body-off restoration of a Land Rover outside in his driveway for the last two years but I have not had time to strike up a conversation with him yet. The point I am trying to get to is that the SBC 350 will easily put out close to 400 ft-lb of torque so the transmission and rear need to be strong. I am using a measley Ford 8" rear for a mild 350 but a Ford 9" rear is generally considered the strongest rear and of course the transmission has to be up to the task as well. A GM TH350 or TH400 seem to hold up well but only have a 1.00 high gear ratio and then the GM 700R4 has overdrive but may not be as strong as a TH350 so I accepted the problem and purchased a beefed-up 700R4 from Monster MotorSports here in Florida but if you use a 700R4 for the OD mpg enhancement you might want to find a way to beef it up a bit. If you go with a TH350 or TH400 as whatever you can find, you will then have to worry over finding the proper rear gear ratio for your application with a tradeoff between gas mileage and stump-pulling torque. I went with a 3.55 rear gear because the 700R4 has a 3.06 low gear but maybe I should have gone with a 3.7 rear gear since the OD handles the mpg problem. If you go from a driveline meant for 80 H.P. to an engine of more than 300 H.P. it is likely that the transmission and/or rear will be the weakest link. Well I am just chatting with you to welcome you to the Forum; there are some REAL EXPERTS here with many years of rodding experience and I am amazed at the expertise that these folks dispense. I have worked on cars for most of my life as a hobby (I also started out as an Automotive-Mechanical Engineering student, but found I was best in Chemistry!) but my present project of a complete build up of a 1929 Ford Roadster 'glass replica is actually beyond my skill level and I have been getting a LOT of good advice from more experienced folks on this Forum. So ask away and I am sure you will be able to learn a lot from these folks with years and years of valuable experience.

    Don Shillaqdy
    Retired Scientist/teen rodder
    Last edited by Don Shillady; 11-19-2005 at 10:28 AM.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink