Thread: camera advice
Hybrid View
-
08-02-2015 09:33 AM #1
So I've got a new line for my sig---------Professional lugnut to 8x10 ---------
All right------over the years, being around a lot of THE photogs for magazines, etc, with mouth drooling amounts of film , and having various 35mm for slides(cheapest way to do color and project on walls(much bigger lugnuts in 8 ceiling x 12 foot walls))
We had a Sony that used 3 1/2 discs that was bulky and only had capacity for a few pics-got Robin an Olymist that would fit in her purse, used xd chips, had a telephoto lens-worked very good , but on the road trips the battery would not make it thru the day (she averaged a pic per mile (ppm) so I found a new battery for backup at a battery/tire store in Oklahoma------well after the first day--the charger was ac powered, so I had to buy an inverter charger for the truck------then since we had that covered I bought a third battery because thru the senic west still couldn't keep up---(batteries were about 70-80 dollaries IIRC) found out charger was from China and didn't have capacity to keep up with mule team driving Innois farm boy so bought another inverter from NAPA store so a warrantee could be honored back home--------was happy for a few miles---------got to thinking, if I was going to get ME a camera what should I get. Came up with the idea that when at Yellow Stone and Old Faithful I'd simply see what all the Chinese were using---------CANON----------and they also had lenses that they were switching between them for shots and some of them looked like CANNONS-------or at least four deuce mortars----------
Roger-take a look at the 28-135 zoom lense-----can take a full pic of a car from center of street without distorsion and enogh tello for mountains and UFO's in the sky. I agree those other lenses get bilky and heavy plus you also then are carrying the shorter one also--------
Also my Canon is an earlier EOS50D , doesn't do video, take Compact Flash cards, and does do 6.3 frames per second for action type shots-----love it!!!!!!!!!!!Last edited by jerry clayton; 08-02-2015 at 09:35 AM.
-
08-02-2015 11:35 AM #2
Thanks, but my 18-200 lens is only two ounces heavier than a 28-135mm, I've got tons better wide angle and at least 60% more reach with the one I use, and I very often find that I'm wanting to reach out farther than the 200mm gives me when shooting outdoors. If I were going to change lenses I'd probably lean towards something that's got a constant f-stop (like 2.8) across the entire range to enhance the light gathering, and likely push out to 300mm or so. But before I did that I'd probably look at shifting over to full frame digital, which is a whole new ball game.Roger
Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.





1Likes

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

I check in everyday and some are better than others. I don't think Brent has anything to do with the forum anymore, but I'm not sure. Hopefully as time moves on the forum will get better.
Where is everybody?