Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Car Industry Bailout! (Or, a result of elected official "genius")
          
   
   

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Threaded View

  1. #2
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,898

    Provocative point of view Jim, though there are nits to pick. On the plus it's good to get a different perspective from the echo chamber of what passes for journalism today, but I think Ed let some of his own perspective bias get in the way. Claiming the UAW as a "last vestige of unionism" prompts the question; Ever heard of the SEIU? This union group broke away from the AFL/CIO because the umbrella organization wasn't aggressive enough for them. They are the fastest growing union in the country. In part thats because of aggressive recruitment (soon to be helped by the elimination of employees ability to vote for or against union representation by secret ballot, an abomination hidden by the innocuous identifier of "card check") and in part because they represent members of another fast growing group, government employees. Oh boy!

    Also the impression is left that the various states he noted for "buying" auto manufacturing plants might have written a check (such as what's being done in DC for the Not So Big 3) to entice the plants. In reality, most of that money is actually in the form of promises to not tax, those amounts being "potential" money to the state. What that means is it's theoretical money. It's money that the state could have collected from those companies if they set up the plant there and paid the prevailing business taxes. Unspoken is that the state would never have realized that income if the plant never was built there anyway. So it isn't that a state handed over a sack full of $168,000 to buy a job, it's that they agreed to not siphon off potential profits worth that amount for the benefit of having an employed citizen who in turn pays sales tax, property tax, excise taxes and so on. Michigan of course has taken the opposite approach and increased taxes on business. Any wonder they have been in a near constant recession even while states like Texas, and South Carolina have been prospering, at least until this year. There's a big difference between a state foregoing mythical tax income versus a federal government printing or borrowing money it doesn't have and may never be able to back up without devaluing future currency.

    Still, it's a thought provoking piece.
    Last edited by Bob Parmenter; 12-14-2008 at 08:02 AM.
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink