Thread: Hho Gas Is It True

Tweet

Chris,I checked that site out earlier.It appears that that this HHO thing is not something that just came up.It did appear looking at the patents (some pretty current)that some Industries are taking a second look at the theory.

Lord knows we need something to replace this fuel crunch we are in. I can't afford to drive the coupe around much as I am on fixed income and It only get's 8 MPG at best.

What he was doing was fractioning the water and hydrogen. Don't know for sure but I think he was combining electrolysis with electrically exciting the molecules to their critical frequency; this to me in theory might amplify the fractioning process.

Another way to harvest hydrogen is using an electric arc to fraction the molecules. This is usually done with a generator so the process is not free by any means.

Unless of course you maybe used wind or ocean currents or waves as the energy source for your generator. Hmm ...

Kitz

Originally Posted by kitz

What he was doing was fractioning the water and hydrogen. Don't know for sure but I think he was combining electrolysis with electrically exciting the molecules to their critical frequency; this to me in theory might amplify the fractioning process.

Another way to harvest hydrogen is using an electric arc to fraction the molecules. This is usually done with a generator so the process is not free by any means.

Unless of course you maybe used wind or ocean currents or waves as the energy source for your generator. Hmm ...

Kitz

I've been thinking about this one quite a few years... geothermal or hydroelectric (or as you suggest wind or ocean currents) to generate the electricity to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen.... But then you have to transport and handle these highly volatile gases (imagine millions of Hindenburgs on the highway ), while it would be much safer to deal with the water directly (i.e. split it as you use it)...

I guess it comes down to whether you can generate enough energy to split hydrogen and oxygen using a self driven alternator as Denny suggested... I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure the laws of nature (e.g. thermodynamics) will not allow this... at best you could almost generate enough combustion energy to drive the alternator to make almost enough fuel to keep generating the fuel.

Anyhow, there was a section I overlooked in the wiki that deals with using HHO to make gasoline/diesel engines run more efficiently by allowing a leaner afr... this appears to be practical and could be what we'll see for the next hybrids(?)

Neat stuff, hopefully we can arrive at a decent solution in the near future... especially to support abundant HP! What about the "Mr. Fusion" from Back to the Future

-Chris

Don wrote:
QUOTE]Lord knows we need something to replace this fuel crunch we are in. I can't afford to drive the coupe around much as I am on fixed income and It only get's 8 MPG at best[/QUOTE]

When it comes to experimental motion creators particularly those that can have explosive results, I might just attempt to put a square rigged mast and sail on my roof for motoring down the highway. Not to good on windless days, and tacking could be a bitch, if not on an multi-lane interstate, but certainly better than singeing the hair on my butty-butt-butt with something a little too radiical and a whole lot unsafe.


Oh, and Don, it might be time to put add FI, and a OD trans. That should give you a little boost in the mpg. If you already got those parts, then you need to find out why you ain't averaging about 20 mpg.

Bob,I have the 700R4 transmission,750 cfm holley,tires are 27 in . Dia.,and 3:70 rear end posi.
The car runs really well and shows no sign of running to rich.I haven't had any experience with FI and would not know what brand is better over the other.I like the 20 mpg vs 8 mpg.though.

Are you running FI?

I agree with you, Denny; they're missing the point, I think. Do you remember the Fish/Kendig VV carb, back in the late fifties/early sixties? It was proven to be very effective, and in so being, threatened the profitability of the oil companies - it more or less vanished, as did it's inventors; and so it has gone with anything that threatens the moneymaking power of a select group in this world. To all of you who scoff, I suggest that you google "Suppressed Technologies"; some interesting and alarming stuff, there. Or, perhaps, invent some remarkably efficient and highly technologically advanced fuel or energy saving device that would seriously change the status quo, and see what happens - got the guts? I don't.

Don, no I am not running FI, and the my record reflects it. I have a HO 350, Edelbrock 600 carb, TH400 Trans, 2.73 rear gears (81 Vette) and get about 12 on the hiway and 8 - 10 around town. Have gotten as high as 18 on an interstate running about 70 mph with a tailwind. I don't run as much as I used to, but if and when I do again, the first thing I think I will change is the Th400 to a 200R, and then take a look at some aftermarket FI's. There are several that are supposed to be fairly easy to install and reasonably priced.

Although FI will give you better mileage and a longer life engine, I love carbs too much to cut and run just yet.

Back in the 50's in high school we separated Hydrogen and oxygen by filling 2 bottles with salt water then inserting an electrode in each then turning them upside down in another tub of salt water... turn on the dc power and it bubbled up 2 times as much hydrogen as oxygen the new system bubbles up bothe oxygen and hydrogen in the same container... JPL in pasedena CAlif normally works on space projects for the government but in the 70's they did automotive research...added hydrogen to a lean mixture and got quite an increase in fuel milage. the hydrogen makes the gasoline burn more efficiently. A lean gasoline mixture is hard to ignite. the hydrigen acts like the match to start the combustion fire. I looked at a site a while back that wanted to sell you the manual for $50 but if you read their questions and answers you should be able to figure out how to build one